In this post, we will take a look at DC fast-charging results of the Ford Mustang Mach-E First Edition (Extended Range and All-Wheel-Drive) tested two days ago at an Electrify America charging station by our colleague Kyle Conner. You can see Kyle's 0-100% DC charging test video above, which appeared on his Out of Spec Reviews channel.
The entire charging session from 0-100% took about 2 hours and 32 minutes, but we will focus mostly on the area up to about 80-85%.
The entire charging session from 0-100% took about 2 hours and 32 minutes.
An important thing to note is this is the first out of multiple tests that Kyle intends to conduct to fully understand the charging performance, including starting the sessions at different states of charge (SOC). The Ford Mustang Mach-E he used in this test is one of the first on the roads with the initial firmware from the factory.
Let's get into it!
Charging power vs state-of-charge (SOC)
The DC fast charging curve of the Ford Mustang Mach-E is quite specific. It starts relatively strong and reaches the peak of 159 kW almost immediately, but it does not last long.
The next "stable level" of about 112 kW is at about 7-10% SOC, and then 106-107 kW at 11-27% SOC. After another decrease, it remains at 95-97 kW at 31-37% SOC. The major stable level is 76-80 kW at 40-77% SOC.
There is no sense to charge above 80% at DC fast chargers, especially during long-distance travel.
The biggest surprise is that the charging power drops sharply at 80% SOC to about 12 kW, and remains like that. The last several percent of SOC are at an even lower level of just several kW. At this point, there is no sense to charge above 80% at DC fast chargers, especially during long-distance travel.
We guess there is a high potential to tweak the software and improve the power flow above 80% SOC, as well as maybe bump the overall performance between 7-80% SOC, through one of the upcoming over-the-air software updates.
State-of-charge (SOC) vs time
Here is a quick look at the SOC progress over time. Charging from 20% to 80% SOC took about 42 minutes.
Average charging power vs state-of-charge (SOC)
The average power in the very important range from 20% to 80% SOC is 84 kW, which is 53% of the peak value.
In the chart below, the numbers are limited up to 90% SOC, because of the insufficient accuracy of the measurement and calculation of the final, low power area.
Charging rate vs state-of-charge (SOC)
The peak C-rate* - charging power in relation to the total battery capacity of 98.8 kWh - is about 1.61C.
The average C-rate when charging from 20% to 80% SOC is 0.85C. We believe in a sporty car like the Ford Mustang Mach-E, it should be improved.
*C-rate tells us how the charging power relates to the battery pack capacity. For example: 1C is 1-hour charging power (current), when the power value in kW is equal to the battery pack capacity in kWh. 2C would be enough to recharge in half an hour.
Range replenishing speed vs state-of-charge (SOC)
The rate of replenishing range depends on the energy consumption and the energy consumption depends on the use case. Here, we will use the EPA range numbers:
• EPA Combined range
Taking into consideration the EPA Combined range of 270 miles (434 km) and available battery capacity of 88 kWh, we can assume energy consumption of 326 Wh/mile (203 Wh/km).
The effective average speed of range replenishing when charging from 20% to 80% SOC would be then 4.3 miles/minute (6.9 km/minute).
• EPA Highway range
Taking into consideration the EPA Highway range of 249.2 miles (401 km) and available battery capacity of 88 kWh, we can assume energy consumption of 353 Wh/mile (219 Wh/km).
The effective average speed of range replenishing when charging from 20% to 80% SOC would be then 4 miles/minute (6.4 km/minute).
Comparisons with other EVs
Comparison of charging power
We will compare now the charging performance of the Ford Mustang Mach-E First Edition with the recently tested Volkswagen ID.4 (82 kWh version).
The charging curve reveals that the electric Ford has an advantage in peak power (159 kW vs 128 kW), but it's a short peak, after which the ID.4 takes the lead. Overall the ID.4 looks stronger (especially considering its smaller battery) and the data proves it:
- Ford Mustang Mach-E average charging power 20-80% SOC: 84 kW
- Volkswagen ID.4 average charging power 20-80% SOC: 91 kW
If Ford would tweak its charging curve, the Mach-E has the potential to beat the ID.4.
Comparison of State-of-charge (SOC) vs time
Now a quick look at the charging time, which is a noticeable win for the ID.4:
- Ford Mustang Mach-E charging time 20-80% SOC: 42 minutes
- Volkswagen ID.4 charging time 20-80% SOC: 31 minutes
*The starting points were adjusted to the lowest common SOC.
Comparison of C-rate
The Volkswagen ID.4 is very strong compared to Ford Mustang Mach-E because charging is allowed at a higher C-Rate:
- Ford Mustang Mach-E average C-rate 20-80% SOC: 0.85C
- Volkswagen ID.4 average C-rate 20-80% SOC: 1.1C
Comparison of range replenishing speed
And now, a quick look at the range replenishing speed, for EPA highway range rating:
- Ford Mustang Mach-E range replenishing speed 20-80% SOC: 4.0 miles/minute (6.4 km/minute)
- Volkswagen ID.4 range replenishing speed 20-80% SOC: 4.5 miles/minute (7.3 km/minute)
The ID.4 is about 12.5% quicker, which reflects both slightly higher average charging power and slightly lower energy consumption according to the EPA Highway test results.
The conclusion from the initial DC fast charging test of the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E (ER AWD) is that its potential is not fully utilized.
The charging curve is not bad in the 20-80% SOC range (though it falls precipitously after that), but it clearly could be better and hopefully will be noticeably improved through a software update.
* Some values on the charts are estimated from the data source.
** Temperature of the battery cells might highly negatively affect charging capabilities. We don't have data about temperatures of the battery at the beginning and during the charging process. In cold or hot weather, as well as after driving very dynamically, charging power might be significantly lower than shown on the charts (in extreme cases charging might be impossible until the battery temperature will not return to an acceptable level).