Tesla Stock: A Look At The Recent Bull Vs Bear Case Debate

What if both the bulls and the bears were wrong this time since the debate seemed to simply rehash old news?

Tesla Model Y (Bildquelle: https://www.tesla.com/en_IE/tesla-gallery)

EVANNEX EVANNEX

By: EVANNEX

Jan 27, 2023 at 9:02am ET

Add InsideEVs as a preferred source in Google

Comment

This article comes to us courtesy of EVANNEX, which makes and sells aftermarket Tesla accessories. The opinions expressed therein are not necessarily our own at InsideEVs, nor have we been paid by EVANNEX to publish these articles. We find the company's perspective as an aftermarket supplier of Tesla accessories interesting and are happy to share its content free of charge. Enjoy!

Posted on EVANNEX on January 27, 2023, by Peter McGuthrie

Tesla’s stock has remained a polarizing topic, especially as the company reaped significant losses throughout the last year. Bears and bulls alike will have to address Tesla’s incredible growth and industry disruptions over the past few years. Still, an argument between the two in recent weeks is pointing to the company’s margins, overall valuation, and, unsurprisingly, its car business.

Above: A Tesla logo on a car (Image: Austin Ramsey / Unsplash).

A recent debate between Tesla bulls and bears broke out during a Wall Street Journal online Q&A event featuring Tesla bull Ross Gerber, bear Jim Chanos and live markets writer Gunjan Banerji (via Barron’s). The unique 30-minute event was broadcast live on WSJ’s website, featuring live chat questions from viewers with Gerber and Chanos answering, while Banerji moderated between the two.

In short, the debate came down to Chanos believing Tesla is essentially just an automotive company, adding that the automaker is overvalued and that its high margins will eventually fall to meet industry averages. Gerber argues that Tesla’s many focal points beyond the automotive make its extra margins justifiable, including its software, service and energy businesses, and its continued expansion of both EV and battery manufacturing.

“As the world transitions to a clean energy and transportation future, there’s only been one company that’s driven this amazing innovation in electric vehicles, and now in energy storage.” Gerber said. “And Tesla is this company.”

Gerber is the CEO of Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management's CEO, while Chanos is Kynikos Associate's founder. Gerber owns shares in Tesla, though Chanos is short the company’s stock — effectively meaning that he benefits from its shares dropping in trading price.

During the conversation, Chanos claimed that Tesla performs like a car company on the market, rather than a software or tech company.

“[Tesla] looks exactly like a car company,” Chanos said. “It does not have software margins; it has auto OEM margins, and that’s just a fact.”

Gerber pointed out in response that the vehicle is a driving tech product, with an ecosystem not unlike Apple’s ecosystem.

Barron’s argues that neither Chanos nor Gerber got it quite right, saying that each of them focused on old news. Chanos didn’t acknowledge the financial benefits of the Tesla Supercharger network, or its margin benefits from bypassing a dealership model altogether.

Other topics deliberated upon during the session included Tesla’s Full Self-Driving and the automaker’s role in the Chinese market.

VIDEO

What do you think?

View

Comments

Source: Wall Street Journal / Barron’s

===

Source: EVANNEX

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Insideevs.com?

Take our 3 minute survey.

- The InsideEVs team

Share this Story

GO TO COMMENTS

(

)

Got a tip for us? Email: tips@insideevs.com

View all comments ( )

Trending

Lucid's $50,000 Tesla Model Y Rival Is Getting Closer To Production. Here's The Latest

Mercedes' Answer To Tesla FSD Requires Hands On The Wheel. Does That Make It Better Or Worse?

This Mercedes Went 539 Miles On A Charge. Is Range Anxiety Finally Dead?

Lucid's CEO Said The EV Startup 'Underinvested In Service.' Here's How It's Fixing That