Home

News

Tesla: Battery Capacity Degradation Averages 12% After 200,000 Miles

The performance of newer chemistries will be revealed once there will be more data.

Tesla Model S

Mark Kane Mark Kane

By: Mark Kane

Apr 25, 2023 at 5:51pm ET

Add InsideEVs as a preferred source in Google

Share

Comment

Tesla revealed the average battery capacity (and range) degradation for its electric cars in its new Impact Report 2022.

According to the company, the average battery capacity loses after 200,000 miles (322,000 km) is 12 percent of the original capacity. The statement is very general, but there is a chart with Model S/Model X, which suggests that we are talking solely about this platform.

"Even after 200,000 miles of usage, our batteries lose just 12% of their capacity on average."

This is a very interesting data point, especially in comparison with what Tesla was saying previously. In 2021 (Impact Report 2020), the company said that the battery capacity retention, on average, is at about 90 percent after 200,000 miles of usage.

The new data (12 percent loss and 88 percent retention) is a slightly worse result, but let's remember that this is a very dynamic data sample and some things are just rounded. Conditions might be different (temperatures, fast charging utilization, the number of vehicles sold in markets where conditions are more challenging, etc.).

Anyway, assuming a 12 percent loss we can calculate a few things to get a general idea:

Tesla explains that it does not expect too many battery replacements, because the cars often get scrapped in the United States after roughly 200,000 miles (in Europe it's 150,000 miles).

An electric car, which lost some battery capacity, still can be used by someone for whom the decreased range (from 300 miles to 264 miles for example) is still good enough.

Tesla noted also that when it comes to battery degradation, an important factor is age, especially for vehicles that are not used too often.

"Mileage is only one factor in battery capacity retention; battery age is also a major factor. Retention figures at lower mileages above likely reflect the impact of age while higher mileage values, which come from high-utilization vehicles, likely reflect less influence from battery age."

Below, we attached the new version of Tesla's graph with Tesla Model S/Model X battery degradation.

Those two cars are equipped with cylindrical battery cells (1865 format, NCA lithium-ion chemistry), supplied by Panasonic from Japan. The refreshed version of the car has a new battery pack architecture, but the same cell format. Chemistry evolves over time, so the results for the latest units might be different than the ones from 2012-2013.

external_image

In the future, Tesla intends to present more data related to battery capacity retention. There are new EVs (Model 3/Model Y), and new battery types (cell formats as well as chemistry types), which might have noticeably different results.

"Performance of newer chemistries (not yet shown here) can vary and we plan to expand disclosure once we have sufficient data."

What do you think?

View

Comments

We guess, that the LFP lithium-ion battery chemistry would be the top contender in terms of longevity, compared to the high energy-dense NCA and NCM families.

The 4680-type cylindrical battery cells (currently NCM chemistry, as far as we know) would be interesting too.

See also

Tesla Model 3 Battery Degradation Test: 8% Down In 3-Years/102k Miles

Bjørn Nyland Checks Old 2013 Tesla Model S Battery Degradation

Source: Tesla Impact Report 2022

We want your opinion!

What would you like to see on Insideevs.com?

Take our 3 minute survey.

- The InsideEVs team

Share this Story

GO TO COMMENTS

(

)

Got a tip for us? Email: tips@insideevs.com

View all comments ( )

Trending

Lucid's $50,000 Tesla Model Y Rival Is Getting Closer To Production. Here's The Latest

Lucid's $50,000 Tesla Model Y Rival Is Getting Closer To Production. Here's The Latest

Mercedes' Answer To Tesla FSD Requires Hands On The Wheel. Does That Make It Better Or Worse?

Mercedes' Answer To Tesla FSD Requires Hands On The Wheel. Does That Make It Better Or Worse?

This Mercedes Went 539 Miles On A Charge. Is Range Anxiety Finally Dead?

This Mercedes Went 539 Miles On A Charge. Is Range Anxiety Finally Dead?

Lucid's CEO Said The EV Startup 'Underinvested In Service.' Here's How It's Fixing That

Lucid's CEO Said The EV Startup 'Underinvested In Service.' Here's How It's Fixing That

latest articles

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU



This Cheap Tesla Model S With 135,000 Miles Has A Surprising Amount Of Range Left



The AI Boom Is Creating A New Supply Chain Headache For Automakers



It’s Official: The Cybertruck Is One Of The Greatest Flops In Automotive History



This Mercedes Went 539 Miles On A Charge. Is Range Anxiety Finally Dead?



Tesla Is Killing The Cybertruck To Make Room For More Robotaxis



Lucid's $50,000 Tesla Model Y Rival Is Getting Closer To Production. Here's The Latest



Tesla Is Now Powering One Of Its Biggest Charging Rivals