What Is New For Henrik Fisker In 2014? How About Getting Sued!

JAN 1 2014 BY JAY COLE 6

It is no secret that Henrik Fisker’s 2013 was not all the great.  The early returns on 2014 aren’t all that hot either.

During 2013, his namesake company Fisker Automotive went bankrupt on November 22nd of last year, but not before Henrik himself had a fairly high profile blow up with the company’s Board of Directors in March of 2013 over “business strategy” and promptly resigned (and gave back his company Karma).

The Focus At Fisker Before The Bankruptcy Was Getting The New Atlantic Model Into Production In Delaware

The Focus At Fisker Before The Bankruptcy Was Getting The New Atlantic Model Into Production In Delaware

Given that over  1,000 unsecured creditors (most notably the ex-employees) are lined up to fight over $500,000 that Fisker’s post-bankruptcy owner Hybrid Technologies, LLC has left for the “old company” as part of their bankruptcy propsal, Atlas Capital Management LP has decided to attempt to recover its $2 million investment from those players who still have some scratch left – enter Henrik Fisker and the automaker’s former directors.

According to a December 27th, 2013 filing, Atlas maintains that Fisker deceived investors about its fiscal stability by both failing to disclose issues with their $529 million DoE loan (like they were being cut-off from it), as well as not mentioning a safety recall on 239 Karmas…a recall they did not issue until a day after the financing round closed.

Atlas says if they would have “… known the truth regarding the default of the ATVM (government) loan covenants, the December 2011 recall due to battery fires and Fisker’s default of the DOE confidential ‘key personnel’ loan covenant, which were not disclosed, plaintiff would not have purchased or otherwise acquired its Fisker securities, or if it had purchased such securities, it would not have done so at the artificially inflated prices which it paid.”

A Fisker spokesperson decline to comment on the lawsuit and Atlas is looking to have their purchase order of Fisker securities rescinded, and those monies returned.

Besides Henrik Fisker, the other defendants named are Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Ray Lane (former Fisker chairman), Emeritus, and Richard Li (a Hong Kong billionaire who is leading Hybrid Technologies, LLC’s bid for Fisker’s assets in Chapter 11).

On Friday (January 2rd, 2013) a U.S. bankruptcy court in Delaware, will hold a hearing to approve the sale of the company to Hybrid Technology’s as well as the company’s plan to repay its creditors.  This past Monday (December 30th, 2013) was the deadline for objections, and Atlas, along with the former Fisker employees, some car owners and another handful of plaintiffs have asked to have sale stopped until they have been made whole.

(Atlas Capital Management LP v. Fisker, 13-cv-02100 – U.S. District Court in the District of Delaware – Wilmington)

Categories: Fisker / Karma


Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "What Is New For Henrik Fisker In 2014? How About Getting Sued!"

newest oldest most voted

Hi Jay, nothing to do with this article, but Happy New Year to you and the rest of the insideevs crew. Of all the websites in the world, this one turned out to be my favourite in 2013 and will be in 2014. Keep up the good work!

Hey Robster, thanks for the encouragement – always appreciate the positive feedback, (=

Also, thanks for commenting on my Fisker article. For some reason I can’t “turn off the tap” reporting on them, lol. I will take this as my cue to continue to obscurely cover them endlessly…despite stories about Tesla automated door handles getting hundreds of comments and thousands of visitors, heeh.


Yeah it’s a quite well done site.

This suit will go nowhere. They will not be able to pierce the corporate veil and prove these people are personally liable. That would require proof of malice or criminal activity, and that just isn’t there.

These individuals cannot rescind a contract made by the company Fisker. They are not in a position to legally do so — that can only be done by Fisker the company, and that claim can only be made in the bankruptcy proceedings. Their claim dies with the old Fisker in bankruptcy.

Would Fisker be liable even if it was with malice/intent?
I would just think that would be a criminal matter if even that, and not financially personally liable. Fisker the company might be liable but that’s worthless so..