Wanxiang Takes Control Of A123. Again. As It Wins Bankruptcy Auction

DEC 9 2012 BY JAY COLE 17

Unfortunate Photo Bombing Of The President By A123 CEO David Vieau (middle)Four months ago to the day (August 8th, 2012) A123 and Wanxiang agreed to a deal that would save the US battery maker, but have the Chinese part giant take over 80% for a total commitment of about $450 million dollars.  A123 is the battery provided to the Fisker Karma and upcoming Chevrolet Spark EV.

Will A123 Prismatic Battery Modules For The Fisker Karma Return To Production? Who Knows?

Two months ago, A123 thought it could do better by not fufilling its obligations to Wanxiang and allowing itself to go bankrupt and tying itself to Johnson Controls in a $125 million dollar sale of its automotive assets and battery plants in Michigan.

A123 thought this (Chapter 11) would also be a good opportunity to break its battery supply contract with Fisker at the same time.

On breaking the deal with Wanxiang, David Vieau, CEO of A123 said, “We determined not to move forward with the previously announced Wanxiang agreement as a result of unanticipated and significant challenges to its completion.  Since disclosing the Wanxiang agreement, we have simultaneously been evaluating contingencies, and we are pleased that Johnson Controls recognizes the inherent value of our automotive technology and automotive business assets”

Unfortunately for CEO Vieau and A123, the Chapter 11 process is an open process and anyone who so chooses (after they have been approved to bid) can buy up assets by simply putting down the most money.

Now for $260 million, Wianxiang gets 100% control of the company, free of debts for $200 million less.  On a personal note, and a former shareholder, I’d like to be the first to say, nice job David Vieau.

It was Timothy Pohl of Lazard Freres who first reported Wanxiang Group Corp’s bid of about $260 million bested a joint bid from Johnson Controls and NEC Corp (of Nissan LEAF battery fame) for A123.

CEO Vieau In Happier Times

Reportedly, the only part of A123 the Chinese part maker did not acquire (quite likely because they chose to not bid on it to avoid a political entanglement) was A123’s work that involved the U.S. Defense Department.  That part of the company went to an undisclosed bidder.

The sale looks to be ratified Tuesday by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey.

Because of A123’s billion dollar+ relationship with Detroit motors (GM and Ford), and its decision to avoid the more sensitive parts of A123’s business, the deal is expected to go through despite some protest from US politicians like U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich) who has already issued a statement.

“Given the thin line between Wanxiang and the Chinese government, I am concerned about the government of China having access to sensitive technologies being used by our military forces.”

Wanxiang will now assume control of battery production for the upcoming Chevrolet Spark EV, and General Motor’s has already said it does not foresee any supply issues on its upcoming mini all-electric car due out in the summer of 2013.

It is still unknown when (or if) Wanxiang will seek to continue its relationship with Fisker, as that company has been forced to shutdown production of their luxury extended range Karma for over a month while A123 has been going through the bankruptcy process.  Wanxiang may elect to also ask the bankruptcy judge to void that contract under a Chapter 11 clause that allows companies to void “below market conditions”.<

On completuing the deal, Pin Ni, president of Wanxiang America said:

“We believe that A123’s industry-leading technology for vehicle electrification, grid energy storage and other industries complements Wanxiang’s strong R&D and manufacturing capabilities, so we think adding A123 to our portfolio of businesses strongly aligns with our strategy of investing in the automotive and cleantech industries in the US.

We plan to build on the engineering and manufacturing capabilities that A123 has established in the US and we are committed to making the long-term investments necessary for A123 to be successful.”

Categories: Battery Tech


Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "Wanxiang Takes Control Of A123. Again. As It Wins Bankruptcy Auction"

newest oldest most voted
Dave R

“I’d like to be the first to say, nice job David Vieau”

I sense some sarcasm there. Pretty impressive how upper management ran such a promising company into the ground. I’m sure all the executives got their golden parachutes, though.

Bill Howland


Hopefully Jay you didn’t have a huge sum invested in those Leap’s… You never know when the pencil pusher dudes are going to be working against you. I smell the tinge of a Rat here, I wonder if you do too Jay, although you may not want to talk about it due to its sensitive nature. All that taxpayer money gone, too, or should I say, “but of course!”. But its been covered between the lines on these blog sites by others.


Free enterprise is a synonym of self-flagellation.


It would have been nice if the $7500 tax credit had been contingent on the manufacturer using US made batteries.. but it may not be legally possible. It would have changed GMs decision to use LG in the Volt.

shawn marshall
A123 could not be profitable. The market is not there. The batteries are not good enough yet and who knows if they ever will be. It’s dollars and sense that must rule and wishful thinking or politicians “planning” an economy won’t force it to work despite the dictatorial aspirations of many of your respondents. It’s all about the batteries. Where is the sweet spot? 150-200 miles of range in a $20k BEV? Until the industry can approach that, companies like A123 are going to be swimming upstream. One thing savvy real estate developers know is that when banks put up a lot of money to fund somebody’s pipe dream of a wonderful development, when it goes bust and gets sold off for cents on the dollar, the captured equity forfeited by the banks may make the development succeed because lots can be sold at lower prices. If A123 battery costs are capital intensive, the bankruptcy should make their batteries profitable at a lower price. Investors have eaten the start up costs. That’s the bright side. I’ve seen some RE developments go through several bankruptcies before the lucky guy buys it cheap enough to make a go of it. Essentially he… Read more »

The market is not there? People said the same about Apple in the late 90’s. Bad CEOs took them to near bankruptcy, then one good CEO made it the largest company in the world.

Never underestimate the destructive power of bad management.


a 200 mile BEV for $20k Obama dollars??.. impossible, but if done then you would complain the car is a stripped econobox.

shawn marshall

Apparently you’ve never seen my ride.

EVs have to compete against high mileage cars that cost $15k and less.

The market will develop when average folks can see the cost benefit right away – cost competitive AND operating savings.

I’m a 40 year EV fan, drove my first EV in the 1980s(at work) but I don’t have my head in the sand.


A123 had good chemistry and the cells were fine. It was the company that failed, not their cell technology. Top-heavy expensive HQ, with expensive executives and lack of sales at a reasonable price (cells and systems were priced higher than the competition per kWh).

They won the auction at a price far less than they were bidding early on as an outright buyer. This is the kind of crazy management antics that went on at A123. Poor execution by management who acted like the company was under university tenure and not a true business.

shawn marshall

I wonder if a couple hundred million in misspent taxpayer funds influenced them to behave that way, or another meaning of you get what you pay for.


Great! Another example of American business ineptitude and selling out to the Chinese. How long before the Chinese buy, steal, or copy all our technology?