Tesla CEO Elon Musk On MSNBC All In – Videos

JUN 18 2014 BY ELECTRICCARSTV 21

Yesterday, Tesla CEO Elon Musk was featured on MSNBC’s “All In” where he discussed the open sourcing of patents and the carbon economy. Both videos of the one-on-one interviews with Musk are featured below, along with the MSNBC description of the video.

“Elon Musk, the man behind the revolutionary electric car company Tesla, sits down with Chris Hayes to discuss his decision to open up patents to other car companies.”

“Electric car visionary Elon Musk continues his one-on-one conversation with Chris Hayes, saying it will be hard to overcome the sheer size of the carbon economy.”

Categories: Tesla, Videos

Tags:

Leave a Reply

21 Comments on "Tesla CEO Elon Musk On MSNBC All In – Videos"

avatar
newest oldest most voted
Anon
Guest
Anon

Elon is Tesla’s Ad Budget… Amoung many other things. 🙂

scott franco
Guest
scott franco

“there is no price… for carbon emissions”

So the answer is for government to place carbon taxes on the economy. Meaning that the price for carbon is given to the government, which misallocates and wastes the money for various things completely unrelated to anything to do with the original problem. And since the carbon producers simply pass that tax on to consumers, we are simply paying the government in hidden taxes.

Spec9
Guest
Spec9

Duh. Look into the matter, the solution people are proposing is a revenue neutral carbon tax so even you government-haters can get on board.

Anon
Guest
Anon

+1

Anderlan
Guest
Anderlan

Pollution should not be free. What’s right is right. God rewards us for doing what’s right.

Use the penalty on pollution to reduce the penalty on work and income. Take from pollution, give to everything. WHO COULD BE AGAINST THAT?! Only the oil&gas industry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHtKI6oIsik

http://citizensclimatelobby.org/carbon-tax/

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323611604578396401965799658

http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/tbs/tp/climate/A1.htm

kdawg
Guest

In Michigan, we used to have litter (bottles & cans) all over the highways. Then they put a 10cent deposit on them. No more litter.

Nix
Guest
Nix
Scott — That is where credit trading comes in. Instead of paying a maximum tax, you pay somebody else to build something green. Here is how it works. Let’s say you are a lousy car company, who can’t manage to build your own EV without losing tons of money on it. Maybe your name rhymes with Biat, and you claim to lose 14,000 dollars on each EV that earns you 3 credits. You could opt to not build any EV’s, and pay a 15,000 dollar fine for those 3 credits. Or, you can call up Tesla, and have them sell you 3 credits for a bargain price of around $3-6K. No taxes are ever collected from the govt. No money is handed out by the govt. It is all paid between private parties. You might object to a company having to buy credits from another company, and one company getting rich selling credits. Well, it is still a free market. If your company “Biat” wants to be the one selling credits instead of buying credits, all you have to do is build and sell a better EV than Tesla. Then you start competing with them to sell other companies YOUR… Read more »
David Murray
Guest
David Murray

Wow.. He made a really great point about the fossil fuel industry not paying the real price.

Lad
Guest
Lad

Yes, He did make a good point, but by far the largest cost was not voiced, i.e., the price to secure our oil economy. W. and Chaney sent us to war for 10 years in Iraq to make sure middle east oil continued to flow to the U.S. God Bless Them, we are still paying for that blunder, still eating the costs and the oil is still not secure. Think how far we and the Earth would be if all that cost had been spent for Wind, Solar and Wave energy and we had developed a car for the masses. By far the biggest benefit would be the U.S. people and Government would no longer be working for the greedy oil companies.

Driverguy01
Guest
Driverguy01

Problem is the government IS the greedy oil companies. Look at Harper in Canada, he is the oil company’s voice and has been working for them for a long, long time, not for us Canadians. Since you can’t really fight them and expect to win, the next best thing is to buy EV’s and start ignoring them. Insist among your friends to skew their next next choice for automobiles so that they buy an EV.
It’s the only thing we can do really.

Mint
Guest
Mint

Canada was given a choice to vote for someone who would implement a revenue-neutral carbon tax that would be an overall savings for most Canadians, and they brutally rejected it.

I hate as much as the next guy, but don’t act like he’s going against the wishes of Canadians by not having oil and coal pay their true cost.

Spec9
Guest
Spec9

Seriously. Just think where we would be if the $3 Trillion spent on the Iraq war were instead used to provide incentives for solar PV, wind turbines, geothermal, rail electrification, and electric cars.

We could have been well on our way to real energy independence and reduced greenhouse emissions. Instead, we remain addicted to fossil fuels and greenhouse gases continue to grow.

David Murray
Guest
David Murray

That’s true.. That amount of money could have done wonders for our transition to clean fuel. And there would have probably still been enough money left over for a Mission to Mars.

kdawg
Guest

You mean.. we could’ve had… the Hyperloop?
:'(

Spec9
Guest
Spec9

Yeah, this was very interesting. He normally doesn’t play the green card much as he wants to sell great cars to everyone. But I guess he really is trying to address these problems.

ffbj
Guest
ffbj

This a vessel like world. Collectively we are are destroying it, using it up, would be a more accurate appraisal. Once climate changes reach intolerable levels for some creatures they will begin to die off. Corals in many parts of the world for instance. Suffering from many pressures, fishing stocks will continue to be depleted, and deaths from malnutrition/starvation will rise as more conflicts erupt as people and nations try to gather more of the depleted resources. As worldwide crop failures increase, in the decades ahead, the world will enter an Age of Famine, that could last for hundreds of years, but no lets not add any taxes to those who are making this problem even worse than it will be.

Anon
Guest
Anon

Okay. Seriously depressed now. Time to kill myself. At least the planet will appreciate it…

Nix
Guest
Nix

He had a good point about the time scale it is going to take to transition off of fossil energy. Traditionally, it has taken roughly around 40 years to transition to a new major energy source.

Steam trains to diesel/electric took ~40 years. Horse and buggy to cars took ~40 years. Whale oil lighting to electricity took ~40 years. Etc.

This is going to have to be a long term dedicated effort to get off of gas as our primary transportation fuel.

David Murray
Guest
David Murray

I’d say 40 years is probably a good estimate with the information we have now. However, there are many things that could slow or accelerate that along the way.

Anon
Guest
Anon

China!

ffbj
Guest
ffbj

It’s a bit like moving an aircraft carrier with a tug boat. Tesla: We need a bigger boat.