Study Finds CAFE Standards Can Indeed Increase EV Adoption

CAFE

JUL 28 2017 BY STEVEN LOVEDAY 12

Cars like the Chevrolet Bolt and Volt help General Motors remain compliant with CAFE standards (Photo by Steve Fecht for Chevrolet)

It turns out, U.S. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards work exactly as intended, and perhaps better.

A team of researchers from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at MIT, and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering at the University of Central Florida published an article entitled, Will Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standard help? Modeling CAFE’s impact on market share of electric vehicles. Named researchers are Burak Sena, Mehdi Noorib, and Omer Tataria.

The study proves that the CAFE standards are the lone most effective means of accelerating EV adoption.

(We at InsideEVs are still leaning towards aggressive and strict CARB ZEV minimum thresholds as leading the charge thus far for EV adoption in the US…but digress)

The standards are more successful on their own than government incentives. Obviously, when paired with the incentives, the EV market saturation is even better, but surprisingly not much better. However, combining the two forces brings the best estimated results for battery-electric vehicles.

CAFE standards basically set an automaker’s average fuel economy for its entire fleet. If the automaker exceeds the set standards, monetary fines ensue. According to the publication (via Green Car Congress):

… recent scientific research has revealed that the footprint-based standards might lead manufacturers to make design changes in favor of increasing the vehicle’s footprint in order to reduce the stringency of the applicable requirements, which might influence vehicle size and also eventually influence production costs (Ullman, 2016). Hence, there is a chance that, in the long run, the CAFE standards incur a “co-impact”, resulting in consumers not being able to find or afford a vehicle that best meets their needs. One reason therefor is the hypothesis that consumers may focus more on visible attributes of vehicles such as size when purchasing a vehicle. Another reason why this may be the case is the increased costs of more fuel-efficient vehicles as a result of the implementation of CAFE standards. Furthermore, auto manufacturers may attempt to meet the CAFE standards by lightweighting their vehicles, which may result in consumers having concerns over vehicle safety, and thus negatively affect consumers’ preferences.

Despite evident discussions on the environmental benefits of fleet electrification, there are several barriers to their widespread adoption. One of these barriers is, without a doubt, the consumer behavior, which, once accounted for, can provide useful insights into the market responses to CAFE regulation. Additionally … further research on the impacts of CAFE standards on the vehicle market is significant to enable improved policy analysis of the implications of CAFE. Furthermore, the time that it takes vehicle manufacturers to switch their vehicle portfolios to the ones with electric powertrains, and that it takes consumers to adopt to such a transformation presents another barrier. Hence, using the agent-based modeling technique, this study aims to contribute to the relevant literature by investigating the consumer behavior as well as the manufacturers’ reaction to CAFE standards, and by estimating the market penetration of EVs under various real-life scenarios.

The research used a previously developed Electric Vehicle Regional Market Penetration model and factored in scenarios including no policy, government incentives, CAFE standards, and CAFE paired with incentives. The following percentage estimates were established for the year 2030:

  • No policy – 4 percent EV market share
  • Government incentives – 25 percent EV market share [11 percent of which are battery-electric vehicles (BEVs)]
  • CAFE only – 29 percent EV market share [75 percent of these EVs are battery-electric or extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs)]
  • CAFE paired with incentives – 30 percent market share [80 percent of these vehicles are battery-electric vehicles]

The study concluded (via Green Car Congress):

Based on the simulation results under the scenarios in which governmental intervention was accounted for, the years 2023 and 2024 are estimated to be a major turning point with significant increases in progress with respect to EV adoption and particularly for the adoption of all electric vehicles. One likely reason for this observation is that increasing the fuel economy and/or changing the design (i.e. increasing the footprint) of conventional vehicles to comply with the CAFE regulation is expected to become as costly for vehicle manufacturers (if not more so) as manufacturing more EVs in a vehicle fleet by 2023 or 2024. This means that manufacturers will invest more in EV manufacturing so as not to lose their profits by risking regulatory violations. This observation based on the findings is consistent with the fact that it also takes time for both manufacturers to change their vehicle portfolio and for consumers to adopt new technology vehicles, i.e. AFVs.

… although the impacts of technological advancement regarding EVs and the associated potential decline in the cost of EVs are not considered in the model, it can be inferred that EV market penetration will likely increase more rapidly with a greater deployment of recharging stations in the US, as confirmed in the results of the sensitivity analysis. The results of this study also indicate that the government should be persistent in the implementation of CAFE regulation, and that the CAFE standards work best when implemented in conjunction with the availability of financial support for at least 10 years, especially from now until 2025.

Source: Science Direct via Green Car Congress

Categories: General

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

12 Comments on "Study Finds CAFE Standards Can Indeed Increase EV Adoption"

newest oldest most voted

Correlation does not imply causation.

It does not take an MIT professor to figure out that EVs improve CAFE.

The Electric Vehicle Regional Market Penetration model does not yield remotely plausible results.

It obviously does not incorporate the effects of the price mechanism in a free market economy.

The normal price development and price competition will eliminate over 90% of gas cars from the market before 2030.
With or without CAFE and / or incentives.

I finally saw a Hyundai IONIQ on the road today!

I’m not at all sure it was electric though. It may have been just a hybrid. It was several cars in front of me on the highway and I didn’t try to catch up.

(⌐■_■) Trollnonymous

For CARB states, they can increase the cost for Smog Emissions testing and go from every 2yrs to every year.
😛

That should help push some folks over.

Probably a net money loss for the state though. Given how inefficient the DMV is they’d probably eat up all the extra revenue in processing costs.

The best way is to mandate exhaust to be in front of the car instead of rear. Sick of all these gassers dumping their poison gas for free behind them, only to be inhaled by people behind. At the very least, they should let the drivers taste their own exhaust.

Free poison gas dumping SUCKS!

I saw that one too. Also since it is singular it should be is not are.
“The study proves that (adoption of) the CAFE standards are (is) the loan (lone/single) most effective means of accelerating EV adoption.”
Or just drop the modifier entirely, as most effective implies there are other things that effect it, ev adoption, but not that much.
Also lone implies there is nothing else that contributes, while single implies there are other things that may contribute to ev adoption, which is a better way of stating the case, imho.

It may help EV adoption, but manufacturers don’t like the little to no profit in producing EVs. Hence, many are produced in just enough number’s to get them the compliance numbers.

Yes, but they probably prefer the predictability of CAFE to the whims of state governments and their incentives to drive demand.

In the end it’s the big picture. I understand that they don’t want to explicitly add an “efficiency tax” to trucks and SUV’s but that may be what’s required and they will just have to do their best to hide it from consumers.

EV penetration WAS the holy grail, however I believe that business model shift (owned mobility to shared mobility) paired with EV propulsion will drive the majority of future emissions mitigation results.