Norway, A Leading Example Of Electric Vehicle Adoption – Video

NOV 28 2015 BY MARK KANE 26

New passenger BEV registrations in Norway – October 2015

New passenger BEV registrations in Norway – October 2015

Renault-Nissan Alliance released a new video presenting Norway as a leading example of EV adoption.

We all see the high market share EVs have in Norway – an order of magnitude larger than other EV-friendly countries.

The video above is fairly informative, and shows what constitutes such a high adoption rate.

“Norway has one of the cleanest energy grids in the world, with 95% of its electricity coming from renewable sources. Today, at least 60,000 Norwegians drive an electric vehicle. Nearly one in four new cars sold in Norway is electric. That makes this Scandinavian country one of the top markets in the world for zero-emission driving.

How did Norway become one of the world’s leading examples of EV adoption? To find out, watch this video to find out the key measures taken by Norway to make EVs a success.”

Categories: General

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

26 Comments on "Norway, A Leading Example Of Electric Vehicle Adoption – Video"

newest oldest most voted
RexxSee

Nice! All countries could do the same.

wavelet

All countries? Really?
Hydroelectric is the only renewable generation source with relatively little investment needed… Few countries have a grid with that level of hydroelectric generation %. Quebec, as André mentions, & BC in Canada do (and it’s a shame BC doesn’t promote EVs, espe. suitable gived nthe mild climate unlike Quebec and concentration of population in one small region); Oregon & Washington in the US.
Iceland, Austria, New Zealand & Brazil as well.
Otherwise, have a look at the list below — virtually all the leading countries are undeveloped, so not really relevant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_electricity_production_from_renewable_sources

Djoni

Very true, but if not hydro they can build more RE with the next cheapest one*, solar, and also implementing new construction rule and phase out old energy draining technology.

* Even hydro damn doesn’t come cheap and some analyst suggest that solar is sometime a better deal.

AlphaEdge

BC offers $5,000 for EV purchases, and it’s offered at the time of sale. It’s not a tax rebate. So they are doing something.

andre

where is Germany or Canada,or even Quebec !!with the cleanest grid on earth…..(0.4% EVs) and the same cool climate……???

Alaa

Currently Germany makes more than 30% of the electricity from renewable energy. Mostly wind in the Baltic sea and solar. If they switch to car electrification then they will need many folds of what they are using now. The remaining 70% or so that they have come from LNG from Putin. The Dutch hate the Germans The Norwegians too. Germany has a huge problem to maintain its current state knowing full well that the world will switch to electric and it can’t do much about it.

Seth

The dutch goverment has had research done on the impact on the energy grid of having all the cars switched from petrol to electric.

Turns out that this would entail a 15-20% increase in total electricity consumption. That is a far cry from the “many folds”

To be fair, even if we wanted to, we couldn’t switch all cars to electric overnight. This is a process that takes 10-20 years on average before cars are replaced.

People seem to get into a huff when something in the electricity grid needs to be changed for the purpose of electric cars, but in all reality the grid has always been a moving target in that respect.

If you compare the electricity usage of the electric cars to the amount the industry needs it is a tiny amount by comparison.

It’s a good thing that power usage has come unto the radar in general, it’s slowly leveling out and getting out of the 7% increase a year in consumption. (a doubling every 10 years). It’s not something you can keep up.

meh

Only 10% of Germany’s electricity comes from gas (just use google). If you switched all 53 Million cars in Germany to electric you’d need 20% more electricity (at an average of 15000 km per year and 20 kWh/100 km).

AlphaEdge

In Canada:

British Columbia offers $5,000 for an EV.

Quebec also offers a rebate of up to $8,000 for an EV, and $1,000 for a charging station.

Ontario offers up to $8,500 for an EV.

Micke Larsson

Germany has very dirty electricity so they will need to address that too while transforming into an EV-based country. They are at about 1% sales of EVs but that number will increase very fast in the coming years, they don’t have choice even though they have been very reluctant toward EVs.

sveno

* Norway, A Leading Example Of Electric Vehicle Subsidisation

sveno

Or more accurately – A Leading Example of very high vehicle (except EV) taxation.

James

+1

We should definitely make cars pay a fairer share of the damage they do to the environment.

Three Electrics

Agreed. Externalization of costs is a huge loophole in current capitalist societies. A tax on carbon is necessary ASAP.

heisenberght

“Externalization of costs is a huge loophole in current capitalist societies”

And please include cost of nuclear waste deposition into electricity prices 😉

J.Doe
As a Norwegian, I know the negative impact high taxes on cars and fuel has for the economy of people and businesses. A VW Caravelle as a passenger car costs about 100 000 euros/dollars. I need a car that big to transport my family. That cost is money I need to get from somewhere. My employer or my customers. I pay about 170 dollars to fill up the tank. 1 hour labour at a VW dealer costs me about 230 dollars. That cost is an example of one thing that makes Norway the most expensive country in the world. When transportation cost a lot, the cost is spread over all products that is transported. That means that everything gets more expensive. Companies are less competitive then foreign countries with lower transportation costs. Add a few thousand dollars in toll roads, parking and so on – and you will understand why there are almost ONLY niche producers in Norway. Either highly automated or highly specialiced. The rest of the companies live of oil companies or the government. Manufacturers of shoes/clothing does not exist in Norway. We don’t make car tires, TVs, Cars, washing machines, fridges or other everyday goods. With a… Read more »
Emanuel

Have you considered the Nissan e-NV200 Evalia? It has 7 seats and it’s about the same price as a Nissan Leaf.

http://insideevs.com/nissan-launches-7-seat-e-nv200-europe/

There’s also the Tesla Model S with the optional rear facing seats (only suitable for children) and the Model X, but those are more expensive alternatives, of course.

Sondre

Precisely. And other countries can do the same. Higher taxes on fossil cars, lower taxes on work.

Just_Chris

F*** me! Norway are intending to cut their emissions by 40% by 2030! That is seriously impressive for a country with so much RE. Mean while Australia, which is essentially coal powered, is promising 28% what a joke. I know they made all their money in oil, but seriously, this is impressive.

AlphaEdge

Norway’s Oil Fund is around one trillion US dollars! That a lot of oil money to invest in EVs!

Sondre

It is a pension fund. It actually to small, so no, we are not going to use it for EVs.

kubel

The leading example should be a region that sees the most EV adoption with the least government manipulation. EVs shouldn’t be the USPS or Amtrak of the world. You shouldn’t have to tax gas cars 100% and tax EVs at 0%.

Let the technology mature and allow the market to switch to it naturally. There’s no need to require people to spend all of this money so they will adopt a technology that isn’t ready. Even if it was successful, using the force of the state to influence the market is incredibly costly and inefficient.

Yes, I said EV technology “Isn’t Ready”. 75-100 mile EVs aren’t what people want. 200+ will be the tipping point at which people accept them without government forcing them to. Just be patient and let it happen naturally. We are almost there.

Micke Larsson

You’re totally wrong. Government manipulation is very important to get the desired change.

Putting a 100% tax on gas cars costs nothing, it increases the governments funds which can be spent on socially beneficial things.

Letting a market mature on its own is very inefficient. A totally capitalistic market don’t strive toward any kind of progress it only strives toward the largest profit. A government push in the right direction will force the market to respond and accelerate the progress in a way they would not have done naturally.

If every state would have done like Norway we would have affordable 400+ miles EVs yesterday and a lot cleaner air.

Sondre

You miss one point; the goal are not EVs, it is less emisions. Since the majority of the norwegian people want cleaner air, we support the ones willing to use and take the risks with inmature technology. When a market establish, more money are going to research, massproduction starts, and we got a solution. When the technology are mature, we tax the hell out of the old technology, or just ban it.

Tess1988

What they could do in Australia or any country is when you buy a ev that you get some money or a rebate if you also buy solar panels as well within 6 months and maybe for homes you get free electricity from the grid up to 10kwh etc. per day for 3 years

Also when you do your tax there could be something like $1000US x3(solar/ev/battery) per year which expires after 4 years so you could save up to $12000 so get a rebate on your next ev or solar panels (could be handy if you move)

Martin Tesar

Exactly my PV system is already paid off – so if I charge the Volt on a sunny day I can drive for free and no net load at all on the Grid.

Stick that Hydrogen Fool cells.

Nice one – Norway to be leading by example.
One thing though – do there EV’s have extra heaters? Actually using fuel to make heat would be the most efficient. As using conventional fuels mean looses / energy in heat, not actually to propel the vehicle.