New York Times Automotive Editor Needs 3-Part Tweet to Rip into Tesla CEO Elon Musk


James Cobb, NYT Auto Editor, lashes out at Tesla's Elon Musk

James Cobb, NYT Auto Editor, lashes out at Tesla’s Elon Musk

Sometimes it’s advisable to just drop it.  Let the hoopla die down on its own.

That’s what we’d suggest the New York Times do in the case of the NYT versus Tesla Motors, but the path chosen by The Times seems to be the exact opposite.

Quiet until now, New York Times‘ automotive editor (the man who rules the automotive roost at NYT) James G. Cobb posted a 3-part Tweet aimed squarely at Tesla CEO Elon Musk.  Why?  Well, it seems Cobb is none too pleased with Musk calling out John Broder’s account of a recent Model S test drive a “fake.

So, Cobb Tweeted away (posted above with Musk’s first response at the bottom) and we’re utterly perplexed as to why.

Musk Tweets back.

Musk Tweets back.

It seems the proper action for the New York Times to take would be to let the words of public editor Margaret Sullivan be the last.  And Musk was more than fine with that, Tweeting “Appreciated thoughtful @Sulliview article.  Faith in @nytimes restored.”

But now the automotive editor at The Times seems to have relight the fire, which is why Musk fired back.

via AutoblogGreen

Categories: Tesla

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply

9 Comments on "New York Times Automotive Editor Needs 3-Part Tweet to Rip into Tesla CEO Elon Musk"

newest oldest most voted

Must be trying to sell more papers.

Surprised no one has figured out a new way to light an EV on fire… it’s been a few months.

Yes…I am also a “fake”

I don’t think Broder intentionally “drove in circles” 0.6 miles to “kill range” like Tesla claimed.

Looking at the photo of the charging station, it’s reasonable to me that Broder circled the parking lot looking for the charging station at night.

For Tesla to assert that driving 0.6 miles was evidence of intentional behavior to kill range is absurd coming from a company.

Tesla should withdraw their allegation about this point.

Teri: Ever SEEN a Tesla Supercharger station at night? They’re well illuminated, easy to spot. Dunno why you’re protecting a reporter who clearly got caught lying to make a story more interesting / anti-EV…

Yes I saw the photo of the charger in question and the reporters version is reasonable. Driving a whopping 0.6 miles didn’t run the battery down. For Tesla to claim driving 0.6 miles while in search of the charger was somehow a conspiracy is laughable. He drove 0.6 miles looking for the charger and then he found the charger and then he used the charger, wow, big deal.

I found Tesla’s use of this 0.6 mile search for the charger as proof of something nefarious very illustrative of the corporate culture of Tesla.

I can’t believe that once again I am taking the bait on this one but here goes. There is another way to look at what Elon did. Many of his touts were clearly over the top. That is plain. If you can not see that many of Broder’s comments were equally over the top, then there is not much point in continuing to read this response. Granted I am a huge Tesla/Musk fan. What I see is Elon taking the fight to their level. Broder set the rules of engagement when he wrote his article. I would go as far as to say that he had pictured the article prior to writing it. I don’t believe he considered his data to be false. I believe he expected a certain result based on his actions. I can not imagine someone having the gripping experience he described on the first day, followed by failing to charge on the second and failing to end his test by existing the highway and charging. That would however not have made the photo op that he was after. Border set the stage for misguided information. It is beyond most people’s comprehension that a corporate level CEO… Read more »

He punk had already run it down!!!! He wanted it to DIE. Dude is a FAKE. LIES. ANTI EV. OIL MAN.Just throw the sink……!!!!! He’s up to no GOOD..

Why not just strap Broder and Musk into the car and have them do the run again, together.