Michigan, Arizona, Texas & New Jersey Nominated For Luddite Award For Blocking Tesla Sales

JAN 7 2015 BY ERIC LOVEDAY 12

And The 2014 ITIF Luddite Awards Goes To...

And The 2014 ITIF Luddite Awards Goes To…

If a state takes action to block Tesla’s direct sales, then it might just receive the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation’s (ITIF) first Luddite Award.

Arizona, Michigan, New Jersey and Texas all made the list of nominees for the ITIF’s Luddite Award.  All four states took direct action against Tesla sales this year, but Michigan’s Governor, Rick Snyder, made the boldest move by signing into law a bill that strictly prohibits Tesla sales direct to consumer within the state.

According to the Detroit Free Press:

“The term Luddite has become a common insult to describe people who are opposed to inevitable technology innovations, deriving its origin from craftsmen who opposed mechanized textile innovations in the 19th Century.”

ITIF says that the nominees for its Luddite award “have worked to convince the public and policymakers that technological innovation is something to be feared and contained.”

The Foundation adds:

“The central challenge of our time is the need to rapidly increase living standards and quality of life for all of the world’s citizens.  Innovation and technological development are absolutely essential to achieving this goal, but increasingly interests are uniting to thwart technology at every corner. By highlighting the most egregious examples of these efforts we hope to better educate the public and policy makers on why Luddite opposition is profoundly mistaken.”

Here’s the press release on the Luddite Award.  It includes a list of all of the nominees, as well as a link to cast your vote for the winner loser, which will be announced on february 5th.

The 2014 ITIF Luddite Awards

Robert D. Atkinson

Technological innovation is the wellspring of human progress. Despite this, a growing array of interests – some economic, some ideological – now stand resolutely in opposition to innovation.  Inspired by Englishman Ned Ludd, who led a social movement in the early 19th Century to destroy mechanized looms out of fear that the Industrial Revolution was going to ruin his way of life, today’s “neo-Luddites” likewise want to “smash” current technology. However, while for the most part these advocates no longer wield sledgehammers, they do wield something much more powerful: bad ideas. Neo-Luddites have worked to convince the public and policy makers alike that technological innovation is something to be thwarted. Indeed, the their target is broad, including genetically modified organisms, new Internet apps, smart electric meters, health IT, big data, and increasingly productivity itself. In short, they want a world in which risk is close to zero, losers from innovation are few, and change is glacial and managed.

These aren’t just interesting social and political developments. Rather they go to a central challenge of our time: the need to rapidly increase living standards and quality of life. For without society supporting risk taking and the constant and rapid introduction of new technologies neither goal will be accomplished. Fostering an environment in which innovation can thrive means first and foremost actively rejecting the increasingly vocal chorus of “neo-Ludditism” that pervades Western societies today. Indeed, if we want a society in which innovation thrives, replacing neo-Ludditism with an attitude of risk taking and faith in the future needs to be at the top of the agenda. (To determine how friendly you are toward technological innovation, go to www.doyoulikeprogress.org and take the test).

To highlight the worst neo-Luddite ideas that if followed would lead to reduced human progress, ITIF is releasing its first annual Luddite Award nominations to recognize the ten organizations and or individuals that in 2014 have done the most to smash the engines of innovation. Based on your votes, we will announce the Worst Luddite of 2014 on February 5. Please review the following ten nominations and then cast your vote.

The National Rifle Association Opposes Smart Guns

The Vermont Legislature Passes Law Requiring GMO Food Labeling

Arizona, Michigan, New Jersey, and Texas Take Action to Prevent Tesla From Opening Stores to Sell Cars Directly to Consumers

The French Government Stops Amazon From Providing Free Shipping on Books

“Stop Smart Meters” Seeks To Stop Smart Innovation in Meters and Cars

Free Press Lobbies for Rules to Stop Innovation in Broadband Networks

New York State Cracks Down on Airbnb and its Hosts

Virginia and Nevada Take On Ride Sharing

The Media and Pundits Claiming That “Robots” Are Killing Jobs

The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Opposition to Health IT

Here’s a link to the ITIF’s website and below is video of Governor Snyder commented on his signing of the anti-Tesla bill.

Categories: Tesla

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

12 Comments on "Michigan, Arizona, Texas & New Jersey Nominated For Luddite Award For Blocking Tesla Sales"

newest oldest most voted
ffbj

It had strong legislative support? Not surprising since Michigan lawmakers are in the pockets of the big three auto-makers. Saying that something has strong legislative support is not a positive, it’s merely a poor excuse, as is the governor of Michigan a poor excuse for a governor. My vote.

Anon

Republican controlled states are regressive policy states. 😛

Rob Stark

Maryland Democrats control the Gov mansion and 2/3 of the House and Senate and ban Tesla Sales.

Virginia Democrats replaced one Democrat Governor with another and allow only 1 Tesla store.

Colorado Democrats control the Governor’s Mansion and the House and limit Tesla to 1 store.

ModernMarvelFan

I am NOT impressed with the list.

Can’t believe this made the list:
“New York State Cracks Down on Airbnb and its Hosts”

Seriously?

The list spans the conservatives and liberals… At least it is NOT politically biased.

MDEV

NRA and the opposition to Tesla the same folks.

Brian Henderson

No smart cars, no smart guns … just some greedy self centered politicians.

EV

Lol nice

John F

I would like to write in a vote for the New York State Thruway Authority, which has no EV charging on its limited access highways. There is only refueling for gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles at its rest stops.

I know where they live too! Ludington, MI.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludington,_Michigan

(Hey, I’m a Michigander. I can poke fun at my own state)

Ash09

Keep us updated on who wins.

“Free Press Lobbies for Rules to Stop Innovation in Broadband Networks”

“The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Opposition to Health IT”

Both of these are deeply mispresentative of what those groups actually want. Free Press lobbies for Title II to keep Comcast and other cable companies from erecting toll booths on the internet for popular sites and services like Netflix. The cable companies and their corporate apologists spin this as “killing investment”, even though Verizon has stated that Title II or Section 706 regulation wont affect capex much.

The EFF opposes nearly all technological mandates from the government because government should be mandating goals, not specific technologies.

CAB

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? Here in Dallas, Texas

1. We have a Tesla service center where I and several other friend have taken test drives

2. Tesla just did an event in Southlake (wealthy suburb) where they offered test drives.

3. Tesla just opened a Tesla store at one of the ritzier mall’s (Northpark) in Dallas and you can take test drives there.

I mean at the end of the day, the only difference is what…they can’t walk you through the online buying process? I sure see enough Model Ses around here. It’s not like the states that allow the sales have traditional dealers where you can browse the lot and pick your favorite one.

Ah wait, I will correct myself on one important point that a buddy reminded me of. Texas now offers a $2500 EV rebate, but ONLY for cars “sold” in Texas…now that DOES suck.