Here’s Why You Should Avoid These 14 Plug-In Hybrids


When it comes to plug-in vehicles, there are two distinct types. We’ll break them down in a second, but first let us say that there are plenty on sale in the U.S. we’d recommend you avoid.

Now, that might seem odd coming from a site dedicated to plug-in electric vehicles, but there’s reasoning behind our don’t buy statement. Several automakers put the bare minimum into plug-ins just to comply (you’ll notice a trend immediately upon viewing the list of 14 below) with various emissions regulations.

READ ALSO:  Top 6 Plug-In Hybrids Ranked By Electric Range

RECOMMENDED: Here Are The 8 Cheapest Electric Vehicles On Sale In The U.S. Today

The resulting vehicles are what we refer to as compliance cars. These vehicles meet the minimum requirements necessary for the automaker to avoid fines, continue selling its gas guzzlers and so on. Basically, these plug-ins exist only so that the automaker can comply and that’s why we suggest you avoid them. In doing so, you’d force some of these automakers to up their plug-in game. A bonus, for sure.

So, without further adieu, let’s look at the 14 plug-in hybrids (in ABC order and some are grouped together based on similarities) that we think are compliance plays and that we suggest you toss in the bin of don’t buy.

Audi A3 Sportback e-tron – Electric Range 16 Miles On 8.8 kWh Battery

Audi has ambitious electric car plans, but the A3 Sportback e-tron isn’t among them. This is simply least effort possible to get a plug-in on the market quickly, though Audi disagrees with this, saying it’s not a compliance car at all. With its tiny battery and 16-mile electric range, this stylish car unfortunately screams compliance.


BMW 330e iPerformance, BMW 530e iPerformance, BMW 530e xDrive iPerformance, BMW 740e xDrive iPerformance, BMW X5 xDrive 40e – Electric Range From 14 To 16 Miles – Battery Capacity From 7.6 To 9.4 kWh

Disappointment across the board from these BMWs. Lucky for you, BMW sells an excellent pure electric car called the i3 and a range-extended version called the i3 REx. Buy one of those two to prove to BMW that electric range matters.


BMW i8 – Electric Range 14 Miles On 7.1 kWh Battery

The i8 is the only one in this group of 14 that might not deserve to be here. It’s an exceptional car and BMW truly put a ton of effort into it. Unfortunately, the electric side of the equation for the i8 isn’t strong and that’s why we’ve included it here. However, BMW is upping the battery size and range to 18 miles with an 11.6 kWh battery pack for the upcoming 2019 model, which will become available this spring. There is no 2018 i8.


Mercedes-Benz C350e, Mercedes-Benz GLE 550e, Mercedes-Benz S550e – Electric Range From 10 To 12 Miles – Battery Capacity From 6.2 To 8.8 kWh

Oh boy. What can we say about these plug-in Mercs? Stylish head-turners for sure. Luxury throughout. But even in this group of 14 cars, the M-B plug-ins really disappoint with electric range as low as 10 miles and a 6.2 to 8.8 kWh battery? What’s that for? An electric lawnmower? Fortunately, M-B is already realizing it made a mistake and is now laser-focused on its long-range EQ series of electric cars.


MINI Cooper S E Countryman ALL 4 – Electric Range 12 Miles On 7.6 kWh Battery

Again the BMW Brand makes the list with this MINI. For such a small car, an electric range of just 12 miles is laughable, so too is that 7.6 kWh battery



Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid – Electric Range 14 Miles On 10.8 kWh Battery

Porsche gets a bit let off the hook here as the battery at least exceeds 10 kWh, but the Cayenne’s hefty curb weight kills any chance it has at a decent electric range figure. Just 14 miles? That’s sad. The Porsche Mission E promises to be quite amazing though.


Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine, Volvo XC90 T8 Twin Engine –  Electric Range From 14 To 18  Miles – Battery Capacity From 9.2 To 10.4 kWh

Almost, but not quite. We’re moving up to 18 miles in the XC60 T8, which almost makes our 20-mile cutoff. So close, yet so far. However, Volvo’s Polestar performance brand has some interesting electric cars in the works.

Check out the full list of PHEVs and BEVs here



Allow us to reiterate that we encourage everyone to buy a plug-in vehicle, but preferably not one of the 14 listed above. By avoiding these compliance vehicles, automakers will be forced to put out cars that focus more on electric, meaning more electric range and bigger batteries. That’s something we should all get behind. Indeed, the lack of sales for several of these PHEVs have already forced the hand of automakers. One such example is Daimler’s commitment to invest billions into pure electric cars.

Category: AudiBMWLists, Mercedes, Mini, Porsche, Volvo,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

206 responses to "Here’s Why You Should Avoid These 14 Plug-In Hybrids"
  1. john1701a says:

    EV efficiency is a factor still often overlooked. There are a number of plug-in offerings that guzzle electricity. Here’s a quick list of some of the better choices:

    31 kWh/100 mi = 2018 Chevy Volt

    30 kWh/100 mi = 2018 Nissan Leaf

    28 kWh/100 mi = 2018 Chevy Bolt

    28 kWh/100 mi = 2018 VW e-Golf EV

    28 kWh/100 mi = 2018 Hyundai Ioniq PHEV

    26 kWh/100 mi = 2017 Toyota Prius Prime

    25 kWh/100 mi = 2018 Hyundai Ioniq EV

    1. G2 says:

      My 2013 Leaf only uses 23kwh/100 miles.

      1. James says:

        Your not getting 100 miles. My 2015 would only get 60-70 real miles in 70degree weather without any cool or heat being used. I would drive it as easy as possible to get that far.

        1. john1701a says:

          InsideEV’s writers really need to publish & promote an article explaining what those number actually mean. Far too many EV supporters assume incorrectly. I have seen quite a few comments in various articles with that same mistake repeated.

          kWh/100 mi” is a measurement of EV efficiency. It states the amount if KWH the vehicle takes to travel 100 miles.

          It has absolutely nothing to do with how many miles you’ll get per charge; yet, we see replies every time a rating is posted with that belief.

          1. ClarksonCote says:

            You’re both right. The 2013 Leaf has a 24kWh battery, so if it supposedly uses 23kWh/100miles then it would have a 100 mile range. Which is untrue in nearly all circumstances, and also contrary to the efficiency you posted for the Leaf above (albeit a different model year).

            1. Big Solar says:

              my 2013 leaf gets 100 miles per charge around town.

              1. William says:

                My 2013 Leaf does the same 100mi. “around town”.

                Even with just over 18 kWh of useable battery capacity left (16-17% degradation), after almost 5 years, and 55k miles, I can lightly feather my Leaf juice pedal, and get between 5.5 and 6 mi. Per kWh.

                But, be warned, if you have gassers in a hurry behind you, in any weekday rush hour traffic, you definitely aren’t going to be making any ICE friends along your daily commute. Coal Rollers at any stop opportunity, are known to eat Leafs for Breakfast/Lunch/Dinner!

                1. ClarksonCote says:

                  Feathering the pedal to the point of frustrating commuters is not a common scenario anymore than getting 80mpg in a Hyundai Elantra, which is also possible under the right conditions along with lots of hypermiling techniques. We are attempting to measure all EVs using the same yard stick.

                  1. Warren says:

                    I think we are missing the objective of some of these PHEV cars. The 740e for example in this comparison test gets 10mpg better than its bigger engine twin turbo competitors, yet it is quicker 0-60, quarter mile, etc. And you can plug it in ALSO. Driving around town, driving through parking lots is a supremely quiet and smooth experience.

                    The efficiency numbers comparison is staggering in this latest Motor Trend Comparo:


                    1. ClarksonCote says:

                      I agree the plug ins listed here are important and help bring mass market people into the electric fold.

                      I just disagree that a Nissan Leaf has a 199 mile range in any normal driving scenario that doesn’t involve angering anyone else on the road. 🙂

                    2. mike w says:

                      0 to 60 quicker is the whole point of these cars. Quick off the line on electric then the gas kicks in. Just doing it for the performance.

            2. arne-nl says:

              Another 2 confusions.

              You’re assuming the specc’ed 24 kWh is USABLE capacity. It is not, it is nominal capacity. Usable capacity in case of the 24 kWh LEAF is ~21 kWh.

              And then there is charging efficiency. What the car reports is not what it pulls from the charger. There are losses that should be factored in in the consumption. But not when you’re trying to determine range from what is available in the battery.

        2. Confused says:

          My 2013 only gets about 45 miles if I run it down below 10%.

        3. Bill says:

          Ditto. On a good day, my 2011 LEAF would eke out about 75 mile range on 80% charge (which is what Nissan recommended to avoid rapid battery degradation). A 100% charge would give me an estimate of 82 miles.

          I could push my consumption down to 25 KWh per 100 miles if I drove conservatively and it was not cold enough to need electric heat. Power consumprion in cold weather with even minimal electric heat could easily be over 30 KWh perv100 miles.

          My experience was the LEAF did not live up to my range expectations. The later LEAF models should do a little better in cool not too cold weather because they can run the.HVAC as a heat pump to avoid power sapping electric heat.

        4. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          “Your not getting 100 miles.”

          You can’t state that as fact. Perhaps he only uses it for low-speed, in-city driving. Perhaps he uses extreme hypermiling techniques to stretch out the range. Maybe a combination of both.

          The actual range varies widely by personal habit and driving style. The caveat “Your mileage may vary” applies to EVs every bit as well as gasmobiles.

          1. William says:

            So true are U!

            YMMV, is where the rubber meets the road!

      2. Spider-Dan says:

        I mean, if we’re talking about what we have gotten that one day then I’ve seen 135MPGe (<25kWh/100mi) on my 2017 Volt.

        1. Warren says:

          Well today, I took my 2017 i3 from Canoga Park to Mount Wilson Observatory (5680ft), four people in the car and driving fairly aggressively. On the way back down I stopped at the Brand in Glendale. Both EvGo DCFC stations were blocked by Teslas! So I just decided to drive all the way home to Ventura County without charging. Trip Stats:
          130 Miles, 4.6 mi/kWh. 150MPGe+. Probably used at 28.5kWh of energy.

          It is kind of funny how the i3 gives you a warning when you are down to about 15 miles range remaining, and that equals what some of these PHEVs get! But as I said, the fact that they are Hybrids and get better MPG is a benefit in itself.

        2. mike w says:

          For my 2016 Volt “Best” I got is 185 MPGe and 60+ mpg on gas, but yes you are correct that’s not what I usually get.

    2. I have a 2016 plug in Ford fusion. Been to Ca. twice. Plug in one trip and No problems with car for 1225 miles and 45.2 mpg.

      1. PHEVfan says:

        Yeah, but at 7.6kWh battery, it really qualifies to be #15 on the list above.

        Yes, they get 20 miles, but that’s only because Ford pushes the battery beyond what is safe for long battery life (ie: they are dying earlier than the competition).

        1. Oswald says:

          I haven’t heard that before do you have a source?

          1. PHEVfan says:

            Source is the number of people on that are complaining of 30%+ battery degradation on ~2 year old cars. They are now getting 12-14 miles per full charge. Full charge is now ~4kWh where new it was 5.6kWh
            Of course YMMV and your battery may vary depending on how hard you drive it and how often you charge. Those charging a lot (2x/day) and driving 100%EV on the freeway are seeing the worst degradation.

    3. philip d says:

      The top 3:

      Tesla Model 3 LR @ 130 mpge = 25.9 kWh/100 mi

      Prius Prime @ 133 mpge = 25.3 kWh/100 mi

      Hyundai Ioniq EV @ 136 mpge = 24.8 kWh/100 mi

      1. Vexar says:

        Thanks! Everybody has their own list, but the efficiency numbers need to be fully shown. Deliberately leaving off the Model 3 was a possible unfamiliarity, but not talking about it is irresponsible. It is affordable, very efficient, and definitely not a compliance car. I’m seeing a truckload of them every other week to Minnesota, and counting the brave souls who took factory delivery and drove it home before that, there’s close to 40 in the state now.

      2. Will goode says:

        So electric takes about a quarter of a kilowatt to move a car plus person/persons one mile

        1. Bonaire says:

          Depends on if you are driving casually or doing launches to impress that friend or driving over the speed limits on the highway.

          But nobody is talking about the meter to battery charge efficiency. If you take into account the amount of kWh used to charge a battery, it is higher than the kWh used in transit. It may take 15-20% more power purchased from the grid than is used in use of the car. 120V charging is the worst as the transformation of 120V to high-voltage for the main HV battery is worst. If you could charge at 30A 240V or higher at home, more efficiency. If you could charge at 350-400V DC, even better. EVs have a variety of charging losses and other factors like ambient temperature that affects range. Most people talk “California range at 70*F” rather than Northern Vermont in Winter range.

        2. LarsP says:

          That would be “about a quarter of a kilowatthour to move…”

    4. EVShoppet says:

      Compared to the inefficiency of ICE cars, who cares?

      The Bolt for example is a More performance, hot hatch, oriented car and a lot more fun than an IONIC slowmobile.

      1. pjwood1 says:

        +1 Splitting hairs on efficiency isn’t that important. It isn’t only range you lose, with weak ~10KWh cars. All that money you spend, also gets you a less powerful electric mode.

        Battery size, range and power, all go down together.

      2. ekutter says:

        We should all care! Better efficiency equals more range what ever size battery you happen to put in it. The difference between 33kwh/100mi and 25kwh is sizable. Especially given that one of the big bottlenecks right now in electric car production is battery availability If you could reduce the size of the battery by 25%, that’s 33% more electric cars with the same range.

        Sure, they are almost all better than gas cars. But many of the cars on this list use 50+kwh / 100 miles. That’s about the same efficiency as my ICE 2010 prius given 33kwh/gal.

        1. Mint says:

          If automakers focused too heavily on efficiency, then there would be less variety, and people would just choose gas.

          Plugin SUVs will have horrible efficiency compared to an Ioniq (e.g. a Model X P100D consumes 39 kWh/100 miles), but an Ioniq isn’t going to sway someone from buying a BMW X6 or Porsche Cayenne, which guzzle gas at 16 mpg.

          Automakers put a lot of effort into maximizing efficiency for a given body style, because smaller batteries mean more profit. We don’t need consumers to specifically enforce efficiency.

          1. Vexar says:

            Hence the Tesla Model X, and hopefully the Jaguar iPace. Can’t wait to get my local Tesla club to descend upon the poor, unsuspecting Jaguar dealer to check out the iPace, all at once.

        2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          “…given that one of the big bottlenecks right now in electric car production is battery availability If you could reduce the size of the battery by 25%, that’s 33% more electric cars with the same range.”

          Nonsense. When it comes to PHEVs, a small battery pack with its limited power output has to be compensated by more use of the gas engine, to the point that it becomes difficult or impossible to make any trip without burning gas. No point of putting a smaller battery pack into more cars when that just means all those cars will be burning more gas.

          People who call for batteries being spread out into more cars don’t know what they’re talking about. The important thing at this stage of the EV revolution is to convince more gasmobile drivers that they’d rather drive a plug-in EV. That’s only going to happen by making EVs fully competitive with gasmobiles — not by taking gasmobiles and compromising them by making them a tiny bit EV.

          Increasing demand for more EVs will create demand for more battery production. Those who call for smaller battery packs have it backwards. Smaller battery packs won’t create more demand for EVs — it will create less.

          1. john1701a says:

            >> Nonsense. When it comes to PHEVs, a small battery pack with its limited power output has to be compensated by more use of the gas engine, to the point that it becomes difficult or impossible to make any trip without burning gas.

            No, that is nonsense. Vaguely stating “small” is not constructive.

            My daily commute, which requires a merge onto a 70 mph highway then maintaining that speed, is no big deal with the Prime using only electricity.

            The gas engine is not needed, despite the “small” battery.

            1. pjwood1 says:

              I “need” to get to 60mph, in less than 15 seconds. I would expect 10, or worse, to come from “small” batteries:

            2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

              john1701a claimed:

              “My daily commute, which requires a merge onto a 70 mph highway then maintaining that speed, is no big deal with the Prime using only electricity.”

              I can’t speak from personal experience, but certainly I’ve seen a lot of argument over whether or not a given PHEV has the gas motor kick in without the driver realizing it.

              Bottom line, “John”, your claim does not equal proof. And aren’t you one of the serial Tesla bashers here? If so, then we have good reason to believe that nothing you post is true.

              1. john1701a says:

                No, you clearly have me mixed up with someone else. I’m a big proponent of EVs.

                As for proof, I have filmed & shared a number of videos providing detail to address the obvious undermining & misleading attempts taking place here… like this one:


              2. PHEVfan says:

                Funny how once someone offers proof (or at least a claim of proof) you immediately suspect them of being anti-EV FUDsters. How about giving someone the benefit of the doubt before trying to bash them?

        3. Will goode says:

          Ok plug in and ice are about a half kilowatt to one kilowatt a mile next calculate how many miles per day or per century . . That’s a lot of kilowatts we’ve used up.The prius that shook the world, still amazes me one hundred miles an hour a 1.3kWh nickel metal hydride and I fill it up once a month . . .mk2 !

    5. Unplugged says:

      The 2017 and 2018 Ford Focus Electric are rated at 31 kWh per 100 miles, tying the Volt for first place.

      1. Spider-Dan says:

        You mean tied for 7th place.
        The rating is kWh/100miles, so lower is better. Therefore, the Ioniq BEV is in first place.

        1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          The Ioniq Electric (BEV) is also probably in last place for 0-60 performance.

          It’s a tradeoff, low power for high energy efficiency; not a case of superior engineering.

          The cars with really impressive engineering are the ones which achieve relatively high energy efficiency (low kWh/100 miles) yet still have superior acceleration performance.

          I think we all know what the best on that list is, and it rhymes with “toddle free”. 😉

          1. says:

            Ionic is at 8.6 while the eGolf is at 8.5
            If the 0-30 is as fast as the eGolf then there will be very few gassers on city streets that can pass you…own experience.
            To hammer you a bit more here is a quote from Car and driver:
            “More impressive was the Ioniq’s 30-to-50-mph passing time of 3.4 seconds, which edges that of the 268-hp Subaru WRX equipped with an automatic transmission by 0.1 second.”

            1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

              I thought this discussion was about comparing EVs?

              Sure, even the weak-sister Ioniq Electric will perform well against the poor obsolete gasmobile. It will do quite well against a horse-and-buggy, too! 😉

    6. ItsNotAboutTheMoney says:

      People don’t care much about efficiency.
      Even people here will favor range and all-electric capability over efficiency.

      1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

        People who don’t care about efficiency don’t drive EVs. They drive gas guzzler gasmobiles.

        Anyone who cares about minimizing emissions, cares about energy efficiency. It’s part of the same package.

        1. Mmercury says:

          Sorry P-P, I’ve driven EVs for 3+ years, 70K miles, and I don’t care about EV efficiency. I care about not burning fossil fuels and still having an awesome car that will take me 600-700 miles in a day (and still have time for dinner and a good nights sleep). That means a big battery and a great charging network. And before anyone says “you are burning more coal”, my electricity comes from nuclear with hydro peaker plants.

          1. ekutter says:

            Until there is no coal generation, every additional KWH used effectively comes from coal. If you used a few fewer KWH’s, the hydro or nuclear plant aren’t going to reduce production. The coal plant probably will. Even if “you” get most of your electricity from your own solar panels, using more still increases demand and increases the need for existing coal plants to fire. Less electricity used means less coal fired plants period.

            1. BojanF says:

              Not this argument again.

              The additional coal generation is the shared responsibility of all users of the grid, not just the last one who plugged in their car.

          2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

            “Sorry P-P, I’ve driven EVs for 3+ years, 70K miles, and I don’t care about EV efficiency.”

            Of course you care. You care because the car’s range is a direct function of energy efficiency, and if efficiency were to drop significantly, then so would range, and you’d care about that a lot.

            And unless you’re a multi-millionaire, I’ll bet you care about what your monthly electric bill is, too. If the efficiency of your EV dropped significantly, you’d certainly notice that you’d be paying significantly more for your monthly electric bill.

            So don’t try to tell me you don’t care. Only a fool would believe that.

      2. says:

        Some ev drivers absolutely care about efficiency. Infact my second ev will have to be more efficient because I can’t add more panels to my roof, I’m maxed out.

    7. Leafer says:

      For the non BEV drivers who read this, it should be noted the efficiency of said vehicles driven at lower speeds (city type driving, 30- 50 MPH), and at reasonable yearly ave. temperatures (Midwest here- not artic Siberia), GREATLY exceeds the EPA averages you have listed. Our 2015 Leaf averages app. 152 MPGe or 4.5 miles/kWh or 22 kWh/100 miles over a year.

      Sarcasm? Maybe guzzling compared to Ebike.

    8. JoeP says:

      My Bolt goes 250 miles with its 60kWh battery at 70-75 mph, or about 24kWh/100 mi.

      If we kept it to 65 mph, it would do better, but we charge w solar panels (albeit indirectly), so our efficiency is not A#1 to us.

    9. a says:

      reply to the article…
      totally wrong approach
      bmw sells for regular petrol car price for 330e 530e . great value and price. Still quite economic and very fast. many commute very little and still great non diesel choice. there are not that many hpev’s around.

    10. Dimitrij says:

      I am wondering to myself where these kWh/100 mi numbers are from?

      If we use the EPA rating for the Bolt, it’s 60 kWh/238 mi, or about 25 kWh/100 mi … 10% difference.

      The 40 kWh, 2018 Leaf is rated for 150 mi, which translates into 27 kWh/100 mi, not 30 .. also 10% difference.

      1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

        Maybe one set of numbers includes charging losses and the other set does not. 10% charging loss sounds approximately correct.

        Some people argue that the MPGe rating is preferred, because it measures the electricity you actually pay for, which includes charger losses.

        Others say that what is important is the actual energy stored onboard, not including charger losses, because it’s the car’s efficiency in using stored energy which indicates what the EV range is. Charger losses don’t affect EV range.

        I can see arguments on both sides, but it certainly is confusing to see energy efficiency numbers reported which don’t specify exactly what is being measured.

        1. Dan says:

          This whole discussion is very interesting. The reason that I am buying a PHEV in large part is because I just hate going to gas stations (not to mention that I hate supporting the oil industry any more than I have to). If I can get my commute so that I can mostly drive on electric mode on work days, it means I can potentially reduce my visits to gas stations from once a week to once a month or even less often.

      2. john1701a says:

        >>I am wondering to myself where these kWh/100 mi numbers are from?

        Those are the EPA ratings. On the FUELECONOMY website, it lists efficiency measurements in the standard “kWh/100mi” unit for every plug-in vehicle.

  2. G2 says:

    Makes sense.

    1. Roy_H says:

      ?? Why does that make sense? I would expect the new LEAF to be improved over the old one and get the same or better efficiency.

      1. Neromanceres says:

        The new Leaf in a sense is more efficient. It consumes about the same amount of energy despite being heavier.

        1. William says:

          The 2018 Leaf is only a tiny bit heavier, but the trade offs are well worth the small weight penalty.

          1. Confused says:

            Yes, like still lacking active TMS…oh wait, maybe not so worth while.

  3. trackdaze says:

    Bmw I8 range and battery is incorrect.

    Updated late 2017 from 7kwhr to 11.6kwhr and 20mile + range.

    Bit harsh on the 530e with 10kwhr battery too. All the others true.

    1. Steven Loveday says:

      True for the refresh, which will become reality for the 2019 model year(there is actually no 2018 model). These cars debuted at LA in November and recently in Detroit. They will go on sale this spring with the new battery and longer range. I noted it in the post.

  4. DJ says:

    Wow. So much for this site promoting EV adoption. While we can hope for more even a paltry 16 miles on electricity is a good thing, especially if the person can charge at work! 32 miles a day isn’t anything to sneeze at nor really is even just 16 for a lot of people’s commutes.
    A lot of these low range PHEVs cost on par after rebates and credits than their ICE counterparts which gets more people in them and hopefully driving on electricity for a chunk of their miles. I guess to me that’s a good thing.

    1. says:

      I bet you don’t charge at work, just as I don’t…. i know no one that has an ev that does and i bet most ev drivers don’t have that option so your argument holds no weight.

      1. pjwood1 says:

        A number of them do. I know some honking X5 and 7-series PHEVs, that take up downtown chargers. A little frustrating, to know their batteries conveniently charge so fast (because they have no range), but the chargers remain taken all day.

        I get the “destination charging” argument, for PHEVs, like the old Volt. But that was 6 years ago, 16KWh, and close to half the price of most of the cars above.

      2. DJ says:

        I, and about 15 other people charge at my work most days. Most companies I know of that offer charging have most spaces if not all occupied so there are obviously a lot of us!

        Glad to see that several other people here feel the same way I do. As much as I would love for these cars to have more range it isn’t necessary for a lot of people and at a higher price point they likely wouldn’t sell as many.

        Instead of blaming the companies maybe it’s more the consumers and cheap gas (at least in the US) that is to blame. Companies aren’t stupid. They aren’t going to build a high range PHEV that people won’t buy because of the cost but they will buy something similarly priced which as others have said gets people in to the mix.

        I got my Volt purely for financial reasons but now I am hooked and will likely opt for a BEV at the end of this year. Even if I had gotten the 3 series that would likely have been the same result so I don’t see why these companies/cars are getting such a bash. Not everyone needs (or wants) a crazy expensive 300 mile range car that can go 0-60 in under 3 seconds and that’s obviously something Loveday doesn’t get.

        1. Marshal G says:

          Not everybody wants a $1500 laptop. But after a while when there was enough demand, mass production, economies of scale, and competition meant you can get a decent $250 laptop. There is no law saying 300 mile EV’s have to be super expensive. Just that they are right now.

        2. says:

          Post a photo, make my day!

      3. John Doe says:

        Must depend on gas prices I guess..and how used to EVs, and how much they care for the environment.
        I know many people that hardly ever has to fill up with gas. Charge at home, and at work.
        BMW had to make a special seal on the PHEV gas caps, since people kept the gas in the tank for so long time.
        To buy a car like this without using it properly, is just to buy an overly complicated car for no good reason.
        There should be a log, that made the users pay the full price, if they don’t use it properly.

      4. Confused says:

        My work has about 35 chargers spread around.

        1. says:

          I’m so jealous!

      5. Interesting! The Province of Ontario added a support / rebate program for installing workplace charging! So, by next round, there will be a reasonable number of such workplace charging points change that mix up here.

      6. Lawrence says:

        I charge at work and it all started with asking for them to put chargers in.

    2. Viking79 says:

      I agree, I guess your opinion wont be popular here as I guess the readers don’t like cars that save 4000 miles of gas a year. I think that 25 miles range might be a sweet spot, but even offsetting 14 miles a day is a lot. As much as I like my Clarity, in terms of cost effectiveness a battery half the size might be a better balance of cost and savings.

      1. Tom says:

        Reads like an Evannex ‘article’.

      2. ekutter says:

        My total driving is about 30 miles a day across several trips. Each trip is rarely over 20 with plenty of time in between to top off the battery. So the 18 to 20 mile range of my XC60 T8 will cover over 90% of my daily driving. Doesn’t do much for road trips though. I look forward to having more options in the small SUV category as the efficiency of the XC60 is pathetic at 53kwh / 100mi. The 25mi of the Prius Prime is almost ideal for me if the car wasn’t so darned ugly.

        1. Get the Prime, on ‘Pimp My Ride!’?

        2. Will goode says:

          For the sake of the planet remodel the Prius, ppl are so superficial

    3. a-kindred-soul says:

      In Holland for some years there were huge subventions for this type of PHEVs, especially for companies, and a lot of their employers got them. I see them parked in the streets at night. Many are not plugged in.

      The only thing that happened was companies could get them on the cheap and employers were happy to have a fancy car. But only a fraction is plugging them in.

      That is why the Dutch government ended these subventions completely. Now it’s only for full BEVs.

      1. Nix says:

        Stories like that are overblown and aren’t representative.

        And even the few cars that are not plugged in by their first owners will be bought in the secondary market by people who will plug them in. There is no incentive for a second buyer to buy a plug-in and never plug it in.

        So the worst case is that the majority of the vehicle’s lifespan will be plugged in. And the incentive basically works as a pipeline to get used PHEV’s into the hands of buyers who can never afford to buy new cars.

        Since the majority of car owners buy used cars because they cannot afford new cars, this helps get PHEV’s into their hands.

        1. Da asd says:

          Its hard to say if thats even true. I’ve noticed with PHEVs a lot of people don’t give over the charger when they sell, and the buyer isn’t used to asking for it. And then when they see the price of the charger, they balk and end up never plugging it in as a result of that, and forget they even have the plug.

          1. Nix says:

            You “notice”?

            So you were there personally for all of this stuff you supposedly “noticed”?


    4. bjrosen says:

      First generation products need to be good enough so that their users can imagine what the mature version of the device is going to be like, terrible first generation products can kill the whole category. Compare smart phones with smart watches. The first generation smartphones had tiny screens and slow networks but they worked well enough that you could easily imagine what they would be like when the screens got bigger, and the processors and network were faster. I had Palm Pre, the screen was way too small and there weren’t a lot of apps, but the apps it did have were useful and the user experience was pretty good. I knew that each generation of phone would be better, that it was just a matter of time. Contrast that experience with smartwatches. I bought the Pebble, it was terrible, the screen could only be read under bright light, the notifications were useless and because of the screen it didn’t even work as a watch. It was so bad that I now use mechanical watches exclusively, I don’t even want an electronic movement. I’m not alone in that feeling, the smartwatch category is dead, only Apple and Samsung still make them and neither bothers to market them.

      PHEVs with 15 miles of range are like the Pebble, they would be so frustrating that they would kill any desire to move on to the next generation. I have a Volt which is very much in the Palm Pre category. 53 miles of range is like the 2.5″ screen on the Pre. It’s enough to hook you on the idea of an EV but you also know that you want to upgrade to the next generation and the generation after that until you get to the point where it’s completely satisfying, for phones that was a 6″ screen and 4G networks, for EVs that will be when BEVs have 500 miles of range.

    5. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      “I guess to me that’s a good thing.”

      Since you’re a serial Tesla basher whose only purpose here is to try to tear down the one company doing the most to accelerate the EV revolution, then it’s pretty safe to conclude that if you think it’s good, it must be bad.

      If you can’t stop the EV revolution, then at least you’d like to see it slowed down by selling these minimalist PHEVs with tiny electric range, hardly any better than mild hybrids, hmmm?

      1. ClarksonCote says:

        If there were a 5% increase in battery energy density every time you used the term “serial Tesla basher” we’d have 1000 mile EVs by now for the cost of a bicycle.

        1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          Exaggerate much, dude?

          If we had a 0.0001% drop in the price of EV batteries every time a serial Tesla basher made an FUD post here, then we’d be able to buy a 200 kWh battery pack for the price of a pack of gum.

          Getting the price of an entire highway-capable car down to that of a bicycle, even without any cost for the battery pack at all… well, good luck with that. 😉

          1. ClarksonCote says:

            Haha, well my comment made me smile, and yours did too. 🙂

    6. Oswald says:

      Exactly my thoughts. I think it’s horrible that the worst criticism of plugins comes from the EV community. People who don’t know about plugins are going to come to this site to learn and see, “Wow even these people think they’re garbage, I guess I’ll wait and buy one when they’re proven.”

      PEV sales are at 1% nationally, we can’t afford to let perfect be the enemy of the good. We should be promoting all plugins.

  5. Nix says:

    Personally I completely disagree with the premise. If we want to change what companies do, stop buying their 100% gas cars.

    What this story fails to understand is that many of these PHEV’s are able to compete in price with ICE cars in many of these car maker’s lines of cars BECAUSE the batteries are small.

    In other words, many of these PHEV’s are able to displace ICE car sales with PHEV sales because they are able to be price competitive and attract non-enthusiast buyers.

    We can talk among ourselves in our EV bubble about how we won’t buy these PHEV’s, but we aren’t the target audience anyways. Our revolution won’t affect them. These aren’t vehicles for converting enthusiasts. These are vehicles for converting non-enthusiast ICE car buyers into PHEV buyers by offering a plug in option at a similar price point as their comparable ICE car.


    Likewise, with PHEV’s Your Mileage WILL Vary. If you can plug in at work and you are lucky enough to live within 10 miles of work, every single one of these cars will allow you to drive the majority of your miles on electricity. So why not buy one of these cars if they actually meet YOUR personal needs? Whether they meet other people’s needs or not is meaningless.

    1. David Murray says:

      Agreed… and by not buying these vehicles, it will hardly convince the manufacturers to invest in more electrified vehicles. The only advice I can give people is to stop buying vehicles that have no plug on them. That is the right corse of action to promote more and better plug-in options.

      1. EVShopper says:

        Yep: No plug. No Sale.

        1. William says:

          No Plug, No 10kWh + Battery, No Sale!

    2. PiP_n_ModelS says:

      I completely disagree with this article. Most people simply aren’t ready to go full EV, but these cars might help them put an EV on their radar in a car or two. I had never considered an electric vehicle before buying my Plug in Prius with it’s puny 4.4 kWh battery and 11 miles of range, but those HOV stickers gas savings were enough to get me in the car. Guess what, I was hooked, and my next two cars were full electric. Toyota lost my business since they refused to offer a real EV (the RAV4 EV didn’t count considering at 2600 units produced it was truly a compliance vehicle). These manufactures will convert more people to electric vehicles, and they won’t be repeat customers. Hence these vehicles have their place, no matter how small their batteries and range are.

      1. EVShopper says:

        I think the point they missed in getting across, is that there are better PHEV options for purchase.

      2. pjwood1 says:

        Like the first Plug-in Prius (4KWh), there is a point where you aren’t using enough battery to offer satisfactory electric mode.

        I’m still a PHEV fan. Heck, on a track BEVs still have a long way to go, but until you reach about 15KWh it’s hard to motivate an automobile, or stay in an electric-mode.

        1. john1701a says:

          Where did you get that misleading information?

          It’s a matter of how many KW you can pull from the pack, not the KWH capacity.

          Convert KW to HP for a frame of reference.

          1. ClarksonCote says:

            One does relate to the other. Discharge rates (kW) are in large part a function of battery size (kWh). You can’t really discharge faster then 10C for any lithium ion battery, and usually not for longer than 10 seconds at this rate either.

            So for a 4kWh battery that is 40kW and only for 10 seconds. That pales in comparison to a Volt’s 110kW, for example, and would significantly limit performance for your small battery plug-ins without the engine coming on.

          2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

            “Where did you get that misleading information?

            “It’s a matter of how many KW you can pull from the pack, not the KWH capacity.”

            Misleading? It’s perfectly true. It’s your posts on the subject which are, to put it politely, “misleading”.

            PHEVs with small battery packs can’t get sufficient power from their batteries to accelerate a car up to highway speed in reasonable time, nor climb a mountain, without an assist from the ICEngine. That’s just a fact, and all your claims to the contrary are not going to alter that reality.

            The first PHEV which was capable of functioning in pure EV mode even when accelerating to highway speed was the Chevy Volt, which originally had a 16 kWh battery pack. Below that, as Pjwood1 correctly says, the battery pack is simply inadequate for normal driving. Unless you stick to driving at ~35 MPH or less, and unless you always accelerate away from a stop gently, then your PHEV is going to be burning at least some gasoline.

            1. john1701a says:

              >> PHEVs with small battery packs can’t get sufficient power from their batteries to accelerate a car up to highway speed in reasonable time, nor climb a mountain, without an assist from the ICEngine.

              Vague posts like that are totally unacceptable. The reference to “small” could mean anything.

              It certainly doesn’t mean Prius Prime. Accelerating to and maintaining 70 mph is no big deal with just electricity. Heck, I have even passed others at 80 mph without the engine ever starting.

              Real-World data doesn’t hold up to the “reasonable” claims. Here’s yet another video proving it…


    3. WadeTyhon says:

      I agree, if a buyer has a short commute and a home charging station, 12-20 miles can cover up most or all of their daily driving on electricity. My wife has about a 7 mile commute to work. One of these cars would be perfectly adequate.

      When we lived at an apartment last year, another resident had a BMW X5 PHEV and plugged in daily. She probably saved loads of gas every year.

      Of course, I think what the article is getting at is: Buy a better one to force these automakers to up their game.

      I don’t necessarily disagree with the concept. I will always recommend a Volt, Prime, Clarity or i3 Rex over any of the above vehicles.

      But if a person is dead set on getting a large sedan or SUV from one of these automakers… get the PHEV version… please! Demand will be what convinces automakers to up their game.

    4. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      “In other words, many of these PHEV’s are able to displace ICE car sales with PHEV sales because they are able to be price competitive and attract non-enthusiast buyers.”

      Your argument is certainly worth consideration, but how long do you envision the EV revolution taking? What you’re suggesting is a gradual transition with car buyers going from gasmobiles to minimalist PHEVs to… what? PHEVs with longer ranges? And then perhaps eventually to pure electric cars? How long would all that take? The average person keeps a car for 7 years… so three generations of that would take 21 years.

      As a reminder, New York City went from a city serviced almost entirely by horse-drawn vehicles to one almost entirely serviced by motorized vehicles, in only 13 years. I hope to see the EV revolution happen that fast, once it really gets a foothold… which hasn’t happened yet.

      The motorcar revolution didn’t advance swiftly in the days when they were just horseless carriages, which were just buggies with a motor mounted over the rear axle and a steering tiller replacing the reins of a horse. The motorcar revolution didn’t advance swiftly until the days of the Model T, which had such things as a steering wheel, pneumatic rubber tires, a metal box in front of the car with the engine inside, and a rear axle divided by a differential. None of those things were found on the early “horseless carriages”.

      And I don’t think the EV revolution is going to advance swiftly so long as EVs are just gasmobiles with a minimalist hybrid drivetrain and a tiny battery pack shoehorned into them.

      The Ford Model T wasn’t a buggy awkwardly converted to be a motorcar. It was designed and built to be a motorcar from the ground up.

      Similarly, compelling EVs are not gasmobiles awkwardly converted to be minimalist PHEVs. Compelling EVs are designed and built from the ground up to be electric cars. It is those cars which are going to convince car buyers that electric cars really are better than gasmobiles. Not minimalist PHEVs.

      Just my opinion, of course.

      1. Nix says:

        The speed of revolution depends upon the size and class of vehicle. For some sizes and classes of cars it will happen sooner, for others it will happen much later.

        If you built a “radar chart” to describe how long it will take for different types of cars, the factors would be:

        1) size
        2) price
        3) performance
        4) luxury
        5) number of passengers
        6) towing capacity

        It will take longer for cheap larger high capacity non-luxury tow capable vehicles to be pure EV than it will for a small short range car or an expensive luxury vehicle.

        There is no one answer for when it will arrive for every type of car. At this point there has to be not only EV options, but PHEV options, and we still even need higher MPG standard hybrid and ICE engine options.

        As a broad reference, it typically takes 40 years to make a major energy transformation. Whether that is replacing oil lamps with electricity, or horses with cars, or props with jets, or steam trains with diesel electric, etc.

        1. Dan says:

          Well, I think that progress is being made by some auto makers. Take the soon-to-be-available PHEV Polestar 1, for example, and the rapidly developing Porsche Mission E BEV — both hopefully out in 2019.
          The Polestar 1 will have 600 hp and 93 miles of all-electric range. The Mission E will have a range as high as 300 miles.
          Both those cars will cost close to 150K.

          But Polestar 2 is a BEV that is expected to sell for around $50k, and the Polestar 3 will be a BEV SUV — both hopefully out in the next 1-2 years. So the technology is moving fast, especially with the luxury car companies, and hopefully some of this will trickle down quickly into cheaper vehicles.

          I hear that the Porsche E-Hybrid Panamera (a PHEV with new range as high as 31 miles all-electric) is only selling in the low single digits as a percentage of total Panameras sold in the USA (i.e., around 3% for the plug-in hybrid version, vs. around 97% for the all-gas version) — but in Europe, 60% of all Panameras are E-Hybrid, and only 40% are gas-only. So there’s hope that change will come quickly in the USA too, at all levels of car production and purchasing.

      2. Spider-Dan says:

        A motorcar is A LOT BETTER than a horse-and-buggy, to the point where they serve almost completely different purposes; the care of a horse alone far outstrips anything associated with a motorcar.

        In contrast, the difference in practical application between an ICE and a BEV are not nearly as significant. The BEV will likely be a bit cheaper to refuel, while the ICE will likely last longer between refuelings (but require you to visit a gas station instead of plug-in at home). Those are extremely minor differences compared to stabling a horse.

        When considering the speed of technology adoption, I always like to look at color TV. The benefits of color TV are significant and immediately apparent to everyone. The first US color television broadcast was in 1953, and the last US B&W television station was in 1972.

        1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          Thank you for your thoughtful response, Spider-Dan.

          1. Spider-Dan says:

            Happy to oblige!

    5. Another Euro point of view says:


    6. Oswald says:

      Completely agree, don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. The pure gas versions of these vehicles are what we shouldn’t be promoting, not their plugin counterparts.

  6. ItotheB says:

    So, I just bought the xc60 t8, and it’s AWESOME. do I wish it could do 50-60 miles like my Volt? Sure. Hell, I wish it was fully electric with Model-X like range. But it’s a great car, and with a daily commute of six miles each way, it will spend a lot of time on battery… and when it’s not, its hybrid system is better than pure ICE. I’m with the other commenters – we should be pushing more people to PHEVs, not fewer, especially when they’re price competitive. Great gateway to fully electric.

    1. ekutter says:

      Same situation here. Love the car – for the first 20 miles. Even beyond that, just not as much. Makes me thirst for more electric range. It makes you appreciate just how nice electric is as I dread hearing and feeling the rumble of the engine kicking in. Next car will definitely be full BEV.

      PHEV’s really are like a gateway drug!

      1. john1701a says:

        They’ll help push infrastructure upgrades along too.

        How many households aren’t currently equipped with capacity in their garage for high-speed charging? How many fewer could handle more than one vehicle at the same time?

  7. TM says:

    Go easy on these guys. These are gateway drugs. People get a sneak taste of driving electric, and the vast majority only want more EV. These cars reduce the fear among non-EV people about having some EV in their car.

    Now (after their 1st EV), they will have less fear and more education about EVs, and realize they need more EV power and battery.

    In the meantime, they are using less gasoline than they would normally.

  8. warren trout says:

    With the big improvements in battery technology coming, I’m not sure why anyone would want anything to do with an internal combustion engine at all.

    1. Roy_H says:

      Yes, but that is still 2 years away?

      1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

        If you mean solid state batteries, then probably 4-5 years, or even more. We haven’t even seen solid state batteries in cell phones or laptops yet, and it will take years after that before we see them in mass produced EVs.

    2. Russ says:

      Because when I take a road trip, I don’t want to stop for 45 minutes every 200 miles. For me, plug in hybrids make the most sense.

      1. William says:

        How about 300 miles and a 45 minute or a 1 hour break, depending on your final destination. Where is your theoretical sweet spot, for making you choose your “all in one – one size fits all” for your non Airport road trip traveling needs?

    3. Confused says:

      Those big improvements have been coming for 2 decades. Vaporware.

  9. Harvey R says:

    The article and the responses leave out a significant category of buyers for whom a smaller battery would be perfect, retired folks who don’t have a daily commute and typically drive only small distances. I’m retired and we have two plug in hybrids, as well as a BEV and a hybrid–in two houses. I have a Volt in LA where a large electric component is necessary to drive mostly in electric mode, but my C-Max Energi in Portland captures most of my local driving in electric mode, with only 19 electric miles (actually about 22/3 the way I usually drive it).

    1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      The problem is that these PHEVs with such tiny EV ranges can’t be driven any distance without burning some gasoline. With such a small battery pack, it’s impossible for the car to accelerate strongly or maintain freeway speed on battery power alone.

      I guess if your objective is to merely reduce burning fossil fuels, these minimal PHEVs will fit the bill. But for those of us who actually want to end the everyday burning of fossil fuels in powering transportation, these cars are not even the proverbial “half a loaf”.

      1. john1701a says:

        Much of that claim isn’t true.

        Which ones?

      2. Nix says:

        “if your objective is to merely reduce burning fossil fuels, these minimal PHEVs will fit the bill. But for those of us who actually want to end the everyday burning of fossil fuels in powering transportation, these cars are not even the proverbial “half a loaf”.”

        I guess that’s my point. There shouldn’t be just one goal for every car for every driver at this point. It is good to have some people who want to reduce fuel use, along with it being good for other people who can to eliminate gas to do that.

        The two goals should not be considered to be mutually exclusive at this point. Two PHEV buyers who cut their gas consumption in half save as much fuel as one buyer who completely eliminates their gas usage.

        1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

          The problem with this argument, Nix, is the assumption that greater efficiency in use of fuel by individuals leads to overall less total consumption of fuel by everyone.

          In practice, it often works the other way. With increased efficiency (and thus lower amounts of money spent on fuel), people tend to use more, and wind up actually increasing total fuel consumption.

          It’s called the “Jevons paradox”.

          And that’s why I always try describe the goal which we should be aiming for, as replacing gas-powered miles with electric-powered miles. Merely using less fuel per mile can be accomplished with a non-plug-in hybrid, or just driving a small fuel-efficient car. Neither of those will actually wean us off using gasoline to power transportation.

  10. Ashley says:

    Larger batteries in PHEVs add weight and reduce efficiency. If people get used to plugging-in every time they stop, the short range PHEVs make most sense. In many European cities on-street EV chargers are omni-present, so it is not a question of charging only at home and at work. Charge-up everywhere!

    1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      Nonsense. Larger battery packs greatly improve efficiency in PHEVs, because it means they can use the battery pack for more miles, and the gas engine for fewer miles.

      The Volt was the first PHEV designed to a true switch-hitter, able to perform equally well as a pure EV or a gasmobile. Able to make trips up to ~35-50 miles without burning any gasoline. The Honda Clarity PHEV, from discussion over on the InsideEVs Forum, appears to be about as good, or nearly so.

      PHEVs with small ranges, such as those listed in this article, simply can’t be driven without at least some use of the gas motor, at least not if they are driven at freeway speeds.

      Now, if you only need a car for puttering around the neighborhood at low speeds, then why not buy a NEV (Neighborhood Electric Vehicle)? That will satisfy your desire for a small, super-efficient EV with a small battery pack. No need for a full-sized, highway-capable car if that’s all you need it for!

  11. Russ says:

    This type of “all or nothing” article does more harm than good. You have to get away from the extremist views.

    I drive the the A3 e-tron and have put 15000 miles on the car in the past year, including two road trips of ~1500 miles each. Over two thirds of my miles we’re electric and I don’t charge at work. Even if the battery range is only 10 miles, given that the average commute in the US is 30 miles round-trip, cutting gas use by 1/3 is something to encourage.

    1. Dan says:

      Just buy a prius or ioniq hybrid; you will save more gas that way, pay a lot less for the car and have a more reliable car too. Plus no freeloading off other taxpayers.

      These PHEVs only compete with the equivalent hybrid version cost wise because of taxpayer financed credits and rebates

      1. says:

        ” Plus no freeloading off other taxpayers.”
        You’re full of jokes today….

    2. Toto says:

      Thank you Russ

      Inside Evs are disconnected from realities.

      Some automakers don’t wait for tesla model 3 and provide solutions to make 90% of trips in EV conditions not in 6 months or 1 year but 5 years ago.

      Inside Evs compare mature / widely available PHEV solution to other new solution.

      For example, ioniq plugin is a super solution but not as perfect as existant solution. See charges issues on certain ioniq.

      I think everyone must choose with their needs. If there is more solution it’s better.

      1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

        “Some automakers don’t wait for tesla model 3 and provide solutions to make 90% of trips in EV conditions not in 6 months or 1 year but 5 years ago.”

        Nonsense. The only way any of the cars listed in this article are going to make 90% of their trips in pure EV mode is if their speed is restricted to 35 MPH or less, and the car is never strongly accelerated. Those who think these PHEVs with tiny battery packs can operate as full EVs for everyday use, even for short distances, are fooling themselves.

        As I said in a previous post, if you want a car for just puttering around the neighborhood at low speed in pure EV mode, then just buy a NEV (Neighborhood Electric Vehicle). If you need more than that, then don’t fool yourself into believing that one of these tiny-ranged, tiny battery pack PHEVs is going to cut the mustard. You’re going to be burning gas every time you drive it.

        1. Tom says:

          I own PIP and my experience is different. City 18km only in EV mode.

  12. Tom says:

    I disagree strongly. I have first gen PIP and even with that tiny battery doing 45 % of all rides on electricity only. Yes, you have charge like maniac but I dont care. And in the city almost 100 % EV drive. I understand the article point but like middle step the PHEV are great.

    1. TM says:

      Yep – first gen PiP with the weakling battery gets me ~25 % of all my driving in Electric mode. The reason the PiP isn’t on this list is that it also gets 50+ mpg when out of battery.

      But as I said, first Prius, then Prius PiP, then model S – I wanted more and more EV. I won’t even consider the Prius Prime anymore.

      These cars are surely not for the EV addicted, but not bad for a 1st experience.

      1. Tom says:

        I agree completely. I’m waiting for cheap good EV so still at least 5 years to go. In the meantime I bought used PIP for 1250000 Yen. (64000 km, 5 years old. Winter EV range 16km, summer 20.) Not bad I think.

  13. Ben says:

    This article is wrong in so many ways, ignorant and extremist. It does not help EV adoption. The author does not understand, how you make transition easy for most of the people. I know many people, who are interested in going from pure ICE to a mild PHEV. But i know none (except myself), who is willing to directly jump to a pure EV or pay 10k extra to get a PHEV with a large battery.

    1. pjwood1 says:

      What is so “extremist” about calling out BMW’s packing <10KWh in $50,000-90,000 cars, like 5-7 series?

      GM claimed $143/KWh, for its Bolt. 10KWh of battery cells may not even cost 2 grand any more.

  14. Bill Howland says:

    I agree with the author’s point of view here. Most of these are very expensive cars and they need a LOT of hardware to implement the PHEV functionality – so why not 20 kwh instead of 6?

    Most of the German Crap just meets MINIMUM German standards (31 miles or whatever it is on their ‘downhill test track’ measurement), so that means 10-15 miles maybe.

    At least Toyota is moving off the dime a tiny bit by offering the 25 mile P-Prime, a WHOPPING improvement over the PIP.

    1. William says:

      I would have thought that Toyota would have done a better job, on overall looks, for their “WHOPPING” EV range Boost improvement, in their 25 mile EV Prius Prime. It looks like the Honda Clarity PHEV is going to be a nice alternative choice, for those that are put off by the Toyota P-Prime design teams choices.

      1. john1701a says:

        Prime is designed to take on direct competition with traditional vehicles. Owners will experience many drives that are exclusively EV and get absolutely outstanding overall efficiency regardless of when the engine runs.

        The smaller battery-pack gives it that edge needed to keep MSRP business strong, no tax-credit required. Starting at $27,100 makes it a very realistic for deep penetration into the mainstream.

        I drive my Prime hard, with 2 no-recharge trips over 1,700 miles each (much at 80 mph) and having to deal with the extreme cold of Minnesota winter. No big deal. 98.5 MPG as of 10.5 months (14,500 miles) and climbing as the temperatures warm.

        Remember audience. Prime’s target includes showroom shoppers. Being able to grow the market is vital. Focusing only on low-hanging fruit (early adopters) can be a costly mistake.

    2. Dan says:

      I’m not familiar with BMW PHEVs, but the new-generation Panamera 4 E-Hybrid (2017-2018) is getting routinely 20-23 miles on all-electric (and up to 27 miles in warm weather), with the usual declines in colder temperatures — according to a bunch of owners posting at (online Porsche forum). And the Panamera 4 E-Hybrid weighs about 4700 pounds.

  15. yogurt says:

    A misguided article as the complacence cars you should avoid the most are two BEVs…

    Nothing screams compliance care more that the BEV Ford Focus and Fiat 500 in which they sell the bare minimum numbers to offset their Dinosaur sized ICE mobile SUVs and trucks…

    Knocking BMW?? They are one of three legacy companies who take BEVs the most seriously…

    BMW sells the i3 and prices their plugin hybrids to sometimes be cheaper than the ICE models once tax credits are taken into consideration…

    1. William says:

      In tight urban / metro areas, the ease of parking, and the low cost (around $100 a month) for leasing a Fiat 500e, it is kind a bargain for budget minded drivers, even if it screams “Compliance” loud and clear, from the highest rooftop.

      1. William says:

        Lease terms for Fiat 500e are closer to $130.-$150. / Mo. 3 yr.-30k mi. Depending quite a bit on your individual state EV rebate program.

  16. Don Zenga says:

    Any plugin is good even if it has 10 mile range. 10 miles / day driven for 300 miles comes to 3,000 miles / year.

    Besides the braking energy is captured and used to get another 30 – 50 % extra mileage.

    But what is bad is paying a hefty premium for the lower range. As the competition accelerates, the cost will eventually go down.

  17. Scorpion says:

    Lots of good comments. Some thoughts:
    – why not 16 kWh to max out the $7,500 tax credit?? These batteries make absolutely NO sense to me! Has everyone forgotten how the tax credit is calculated? It’s $2,500 just for having a plug, and at least 4 kWh…then $417 for each extra kWh above 4. Hello? Someone correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t that make a 16 kWh PHEV CHEAPER than anything less (since batteries cost less than $150/kWh now), after tax credit?
    – The affluent buyers of these PHEV’s are almost sure to have at least $7,500 in tax liability. The extra weight to get to 16 kWh is marginal and not likely to affect efficiency (and any drop in efficiency is swamped by more kWh, so still more range).
    – if these PHEV owners ARE plugging in frequently (that’s debatable – the manufacturer should be required to log data in order to get emissions credit) then the same 10 seconds it takes to plug in will have put MORE range in by the time they return to the vehicle. Better reward for a new habit
    – Aside from a minimum of 16 kWh, each of these luxury cars should have a CCS. Combo port, with ability to charge at 24 to 48 kW DC. That way an 80% SOC can be reached in 20-30 minutes. All of these features are easy to hide into the price tag of these vehicles, so there really is no excuse

    1. john1701a says:

      Maxing out the tax-credit with a 16 kWh offering unable to achieve high-volume sales that are both profitable & sustainable is a terrible idea.

      GM made that mistake with Volt. The tax-credits will expire and there nope hope of achieving that goal. Even with the $7,500 incentive, sales are far too low for good business. Volt is trapped as a niche.

      Striving to deliver something with a reasonable MSRP even without tax-credit help is the better choice. Otherwise, how will traditional vehicles be replaced on the large scale?

      1. pjwood1 says:

        Many here have been “straight to BEV” preaching, for a long time. That’s how they want the transition, and at this point is where it will go, without respectable 15-25KWh PHEVs ever arriving.

        It’s about what you want to pay up for, John, not what’s profitable to car makers. The higher end badges are where the price is, it tours better, and electric drive is much more luxurious, responsive, etc.

        Chevy’s problem was being a budget car & truck maker. The Volt parachuted into a no man’s land, with a ground-up battery design. The compliance cars, above, are where decent batteries could still be profitable. Just less profitable. I don’t have a problem with that. BMW should be selling compelling ground-up battery designs, among myriad body styles, and they have none, zero. I respect capitalism a lot more than the market-making these companies have attempted.

      2. Volts problem is as much buying ignorance, as it is being a Compact, with only room for kids ti younger teens or your short friends in the back seat!

        It’s a great drivetrain, that should go in more products! The Bolt EV could use the front seats from the Volt, keep 40 of its 60 kWh, and an 8-10 gallon fuel tank, and give a 150+ EV mile base, plus 300+ miles more for long trips, or 450+ miles from a start of a trip with full charge and fresh tank of gas!

        “The Bolt EREV: More EV Range, More Headroom, Better Seats, Electric Every day of the week, Gas for the All Day Drive to Grandma’s House! Range Anxiety? Zero!”

        There’s your pitch, GM!

      3. Spider-Dan says:

        You keep making an appeal to mass marketability, yet the Volt’s top sales months significantly outstrip those of the Prime’s top sales months. So what gives?

        1. john1701a says:

          Prime isn’t available in much of the middle of the country and it has a much lower MSRP.

          You have to look at the big picture, not cherry-pick certain highlights.

    2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      “…doesn’t that make a 16 kWh PHEV CHEAPER than anything less (since batteries cost less than $150/kWh now), after tax credit?”

      Sure, it ought to make it cheapest for the buyer. But it would be much more expensive for the auto maker. Building a PHEV with that good a range means building one with a significantly larger and more powerful battery pack. That would require the auto maker to actually design and build the car to be a PHEV, rather than shoehorn a minimalist PHEV drivetrain and a tiny battery pack into a gasmobile.

      Are these tiny-ranged PHEVs really helping to advance the EV revolution? Or are they a case of auto makers actually avoiding making compelling EVs, by making gasmobiles with just a little EV tech added?

      1. Dan says:

        Here’s some info on the Mission E car, expected next year: The Porsche Mission E is Porsche’s first fully electric car,[6] except for some very early Porsche models.[7] The Mission E is powered by two electric motors: one at the front axle and one at the back. All four wheels are individually controlled by the Porsche Torque vectoring system. The two electric motors produce more than 440 kW (600 hp).[8] The car has a system power of 800 V DC. The batteries can be charged by an inductive plate or with an conventional charger system. Porsche claims that with the Porsche Turbo charging system the battery is loaded to 80% in just 15 minutes.

        The Mission E is expected to go into production at Porsche’s Zuffenhausen plant in 2019.[3] Porsche expects to produce around 15,000-20,000 per year.[4]

        The Mission E is built at an entirely new platform, and has over 600 HP. It goes from 0–100 km/h in 3.5 seconds and 0–200 km/h in 12 seconds. The projected top speed is over 250 km/h. Porsche is aiming for the Mission E to achieve a range of over 500 km (310 mi).[3] Porsche’s chairman, Oliver Blume, told CAR Magazine in September 2017 that the Misson E will be “priced like entry-level Panamera,” which begins at $85,000.

        The Mission E will be all-electric, all the time. It will perform the benchmark zero-to-60-mph sprint in 3.5 seconds in its fastest configuration. Top speed will be electronically limited to 155 mph. The battery pack will store enough electricity for about 300 miles of real-world range, according to early estimates, and it will be compatible with Porsche’s novel 800-volt technology. Porsche is working with external suppliers like LG and Panasonic to develop the lithium-ion pack.

        Looking ahead, the firm is spending its development dollars on solid-state and lithium-ion batteries. It doesn’t expect them to arrive until 2025 and 2030, respectively. Lithium-ion will be the standard chemistry in electric car batteries in the coming years.

        Camouflaged prototypes are already criss-crossing the globe. We expect the Porsche Mission E to make its public debut at a major auto show either late this year or in early 2019. If this prediction is accurate, the company’s first full-production electric model will arrive in showrooms in time for the 2020 model year. Porsche could later keep the momentum going — and leverage the benefits of economies of scale — by introducing at least one additional electric model that will take the form of an SUV.

        In terms of pricing, the Mission E will slot between the Cayenne and the Panamera. It will carry a base price of about $75,000 before incentives are factored in. In other words, it will fight in exactly the same segment as the Tesla Model S.


        I wasn’t aware the Mission E would be so cheap (I had heard $150k previously). This is an example of huge effort going into the technology, which will hopefully trickle down quickly to non-luxury-car brands.

    3. Nix says:

      Space is the problem for most car makers. They would have to intrude into passenger and cargo space even more if they increased the battery size.

  18. David says:

    I think the article is good to point out that all EVs are not created equal. Creating super low range PHEVs short changes what can be done with an EV. Anything to encourage manufacturers to step up their game and get serious is good. We’re far enough now that there are real choices available. No need to settle for minuscule range.

  19. Confused says:

    Waiting for my PHEV Sprinter type van with 50 miles of range.

    1. William says:

      How long are you estimating that you’ll be waiting for your Sprinter? A year or two?

    2. 2 Wheel Drive or 4 Wheel Drive (1 motor or 2)?

      L2 Charging Only, or CCS Too?

  20. Spider-Dan says:

    I agree with a lot of the other comments in this article. Even the <20mi PHEVs are still no worse than HEVs, which are better than straight ICEs.

    1. Maybe we just need a program, App, or Web Page: one that we enter our Daily Commute, Weekend Drives, and Vacation Drives; plus Home & Work Charging opportunities, size of Family, & number of Drivers / Vehicles in use, and it charts out the cars, color coded, from best (Geen) to worst (Red), so that we can just select the best that suits our needs?

      For Example, a Smart ED might cover the Commute (Green), but only part of the Weekend Drive, or Not enough seats for the Family to ride together (Yellow, or Red, accordingly)!

      Such App or web page might also consider our location, and the nearest locations to buy such selected Vehicle: Proximity 1-10 Miles = Green; 10-40 Miles = Yellow; 40+ Miles away = Red! Or some such idea, with more choices, as required!

  21. PHEVfan says:

    My ~20 mile PHEV is the best all-in-one car. My daily commute can be all electric, and I can still take it on weekend trips without any ‘range anxiety’ Yes, I have to use gas on the longer trips, but at ~45 MPG, it beats the hybrid that it replaced, and any ICE out there Win-win.

  22. Texas FFE says:

    I would not buy anything that burns gas now but I do own a 2015 Fusion Energi. I traded in a 2011 Fusion Hybrid for the Fusion Energi. At the time I bought the Fusion Energi, going from a car that only had one mile of electric range and could not be charged to a car that had 20 miles of electric range and could be charged was a really big, exciting thing for me.

    At the current level of EV adoption I think these PHEVs play a very important role. These PHEVs allow people that have never experience EV driving to get there foot in the door without losing the familiarity of a gas car. I would hope that many of these people after they gain experience will push for all electric vehicles like I do.

    I think a big change that’s coming for PHEVs is fast charging. At the car show I went to this weekend I saw that the Mitsubishi Outlander had a CHAdeMO receptacle and the Toyota Prius Prime had a cutout for a CHAdeMO receptacle. Having fast charging capabilities on a PHEV with limited range really makes a lot of sense.

    I think that being able to fast charge is going to be a huge selling point for PHEVs from now on. I think we will see PHEV models that don’t have fast charging capabilities start to loose significantly market share against PHEV models that can fast charge. I think manufacturers that want to stay competitive in the PHEV market are going to have find a way to add fast charging to their models.

    1. Texas FFE says:

      The Prius Prime is poised to dominate EV sales this month. AutoTrader is showing about 5,500 Prius Primes for sale, compared to 3,500 Chevrolet Volts for sale. The Outlander has the potential to dominate EV sales also but it looks Mitsubishi is having some teething problems with the US market.

      Remember that the reason the Outlander tock three years to make it to the US market was because it kept getting sold out in its’ initial markets. The Outlander is a great SUV at a reasonable price and it could easily steal the show if Mitsubishi can get enough of them on dealer lots. Right not inventory of the Outlander on dealer lots hasn’t even hit 1000 so it does not yet look like Mitsubishi is serious about selling the Outlander in the US.

    2. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      “I think we will see PHEV models that don’t have fast charging capabilities start to loose significantly market share against PHEV models that can fast charge.”

      Faster fast-charging is another benefit of EVs with larger battery packs. That’s another disadvantage of these tiny-ranged PHEVs; the battery packs are so small that their ability to fast-charge is very limited, in terms of miles added per minute.

      It continues to amaze me that so many EV advocates are pushing for small battery packs. That’s not the way to advance the EV revolution; that’s the way to keep EVs as limited-capability cars which will only appeal to a small niche market!

      Up the EV revolution!

    3. Spider-Dan says:

      DCFC is simply too expensive to be worth it in a PHEV. Gas prices would need to more-than-double before quick charging became cost-efficient.

      While I understand that there are some people who are willing to pay more to stay electric, that small minority is not the basis for a healthy DCFC infrastructure, nor is it sustainable from the perspective of automaker pricing.

      1. Texas FFE says:

        Too expensive, are you kidding? Look at the list PHEVs above, they are almost all premium models. The people that buy these cars are all about comfort and convenience and a few hundred more for fast charging would hardly be noticed.

    4. Texas FFE says:

      A few months ago I drove my Fusion Energi up to Colorado and back. On the way back I decided to try to charge a few times to offset my gas consumption. The first time I tried to charge it was very early, nothing around was open, and it was so cold the heater was consuming most of the 3.3 kW coming out of the Fusion Energi charger.

      Even with the heater off it was still going to take a couple of hours to charge the 7 kWh battery pack. After about twenty minutes I lost interest in sitting around a couple hours in the cold every time I wanted to charge. I check out a few chargers on the way home after that but I didn’t try to charge at any of them.

      People that buy PHEVs world prefer to run their cars on electricity instead of gas, that’s why they bought a plugin in the first place. I think that people with PHEVs would be very interested in fast charging if it is available to them. And for all those nay sayers that say you can’t fast charge the small battery of a PHEV, it looks like Mitsubishi and Toyota are getting ready to prove you wrong.

  23. Doggydogworld says:

    I’m glad you included a Volvo to avoid accusations of German-bashing 🙂

  24. Paul Lawrence says:

    So I like this site to learn about EVs, I buy an Audi A-3 etron last September because it really met our needs and now you want to make me feel bad for doing so? Not a way to keep your readers happy.

    1. William says:

      Look at the fun to drive aspect of your A3 etron. It is a drivers car. Enjoy those curves out there, the A3 is built to take em! The Plug-in Purists around here, want the ICE OEMs to give them everything they want today, but of course available at least yesterday.

      Patience is NOT one of the leading Plug-in Purist virtues. Especially around these parts.

      1. Paul Lawrence says:

        Hi William – I 100% agree with you and love how the e-tron drives and love its creature comforts. We never put gas in it the way we drive (and with the fast 220 charger we have). I would just think that this site would want to help people get any EV or plug-in hybrid, as now that we’ve gotten the e-tron I could see us getting a true EV for the next vehicle.

    2. Paul, I would take it more to mean this: If you are buying a PHEV in February, 2018, be aware of what is out there, and what its limitations are!

      If, however, over 90% of your daily commute and/or weekend needs can be covered by the selected vehicles EV Range, and its size and costs suit your needs and budget, go ahead and buy it!

      Yet, if it will only divert a very small % of your regular driving needs to Electric, and stays in ICE mode over 80% of the time: you should consider one of the higher range PHEV’s, if you want to help move the needle forward!

      I believe, this approach I just layed out, is clearer, but requires some thinking, calculation, and judgement!

      1. Paul Lawrence says:

        Robert – Thanks for your reply, which is well reasoned and describes exactly why we bought the etron -since we got 220 charging at home my wife uses nearly no gas now. We’ve probably have filled it up with gas three times at most since September and those would be half tanks. The problem is that this article doesn’t say what you said and says we shouldn’t buy these cars because they are “compliance cars” so a new reader to this site may just disregard these cars now.

    3. Davek says:

      In defence of the A3 e-tron, I’m not far from buying an almost identical Golf GTE because it happens to be the best car on the (German) market for my needs. Yes, the A3/GTE don’t have quite as much range as I’d like, but it’s enough to cover our daily drives, and on longer trips a larger battery wouldn’t really help all that much. As for the range, 16 miles (25.6 km) is, from what I’ve seen, pretty pessimistic, with most people I’ve seen talking more about an easy 30-35km (19-22mi).

      A good many other cars, like ALL of the Hyundai/Kia PHEVs, have almost identical battery capacities to the GTE/A3 but are deeply flawed in other ways. For instance the Ioniq Plug-In (always an IEVs favourite) has more electric range on paper, but can’t heat electrically. As soon as you want any warm air it turns into a normal hybrid and lights up the ICE to provide heat. I don’t want an expensive, complicated drivetrain that only works the way it’s supposed to for half of the year! That’s why this article, while not completely wrong, vastly oversimplifies a very complicated issue that comes down to more than just kWh and km of range.

      I’m not buying the GTE because it’s the perfect car (for one thing a wagon body style would be nice), but there isn’t anything better for a price that I’m able to pay. But if anyone can think of something I’ve missed, I’ll gladly take suggestions.

      1. Paul Lawrence says:

        Davek – We really like the A-3 etron, as it really checks off all of the boxes for us, as the range is plenty for us and we like the high end interior features and quality. A 220 charger at home is a must though, so please be sure to take that into account when making your decision.

        1. Davek says:

          Thanks Paul, glad to hear that your experience is positive so far! We’re looking into getting a three-phase charger installed (overkill for the GTE, I know), but the first step is a standard schuko plug. Of course we have the built-in advantage that ALL plugs here in Europe are at least 230V 😉 I think we can survive on the car’s level 1 charger cable for a while, provided we get a proper heavy duty schuko installed. I’ll probably keep it to 10A just to be safe though…

          1. Paul Lawrence says:

            After I pushed send, I realized that you don’t have to deal with the 110 volt issue we have stateside! We are using the charger that came with the e-tron which with 220 charges fully in 90 to 120 minutes which has made a huge difference. With the 110 it would take 8 hours to charge.

        2. Russ says:

          I’m loving my A3 e-tron. 15,000 miles in and about 2/3 have been fully electric. I’ll second the suggestion to get a 240V outlet. We have free weekend electricity and I can recharge quickly between my weekend errands.

          And it drives like a German car, very quick/responsive when you want it to be. We’ve taken a few roadtrips (~1500 miles each) and it was great. Wish it had a little more cargo room (like my Sportwagen it replaced) but passenger space is fine for 4 adults.

          Based on my price for electricity (converted to the equivalent gas price), I’m getting around 53mpg. Between this and my father-in-law’s Prius, I know which one I’d rather be driving daily.

  25. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

    GAHHH! I didn’t realize there were so many PHEVs with an all-electric range as tiny as the first-generation plug-in Prius!

    How horrible. Why even bother to engineer and produce a car to be a PHEV but give it such a tiny all-electric range?

    They say “half a loaf is better than none”, but when you get down to something like 1/8 of a loaf… it’s no more than an appetizer that only makes you hungry for more!

    I like to say the EV revolution advances in many ways… but these cars aren’t much of an advance over non-plug-in hybrids!

    1. pjwood1 says:

      PP, You have to realize how bad the “incrementalism” really is. Manufacturers still hold hope for 48V micro-hybrid systems, that don’t plug in, or even harvest kinetic energy like the (15 year old) Prius did. We Americans gripe, but its here where PHEV and BEV are predicted, by IHS Insight, to make up much more of the sales pie.

      I couldn’t believe until I saw, just how abused a “regenerative display” was, until I drove a 430i BMW. The car has no brake, or driveshaft, regen. Just a “Regenerative 210 Amp Alternator”, that probably came out of a joke bag.

      1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

        Yeah, the micro-EV hybrids which use a beefed-up alternator that doubles as a generator and a starter motor for the stop/start system, coupled with a truly tiny battery pack. Yes, those here who say that something is better than nothing have a point. I admit to some impatience. The problem is that these are not that much better than nothing, so why bother? Just think how many truly compelling EVs could be built with the same amount of effort and money invested!

        I’m now over 60, and I’ve been hoping to see gasmobiles become obsolete ever since I was a teenager. Yes, the EV revolution is advancing… with excruciating slowness!

        1. Well P-P, we just passed January, that’s when Molasses moves so slow, and Detroit Shows its ‘Progress!’ Any coincidence that they match?

    2. Tom says:

      Yes, it looks funny such a small battery but even so I was really surprised how it helps. So really is still much better than no battery at all.

      1. Will goode says:

        You are right there Tom while a Tesla is grabbing 100x as much lithium as say seventy hybrids

  26. Texas FFE says:

    I’m surprised that the Fusion Energi and the C-Max Energi didn’t make the list, their electric only range is not much better than many of those other cars. I can only imagine that saying the models that made Ford one of the top EV sellers for many years were compliance car would seem pretty disingenuous. Both the Fusion Energi and the C-Max Energi have been very popular in Texas.

    1. David Murray says:

      it seems like 20 miles of range seemed to be their threshold for deciding what a decent range is. Regardless, one thing is undeniable about Ford’s products, they are at least available in all 50 states and for the most part seem to be stocked somewhat at most dealers. Of course, with the discontinuation fo the C-Max Energi, I guess the Fusion Energi is their only PHEV at this point.

  27. Jean-François Morissette says:

    I would be curious to hear Jay Cole on this. Is he still at InsideEVs, I miss his writing and insights?

    1. Pushmi-Pullyu says:

      He’s still listed on staff, but clearly he’s cut back on his contributions. We might say he’s “taken a back seat”. 😉

      I, too, miss the occasional long but extremely insightful and interesting posts he used to make in the comment sections. I have learned a lot from those, far more than from 98% or more of the news articles here.

  28. Jerry Diamond says:

    For my liking i love the Honda Clarity. Basically the same system as the Volt but a much better looking car and has a real back seat that will fit 3 people. But best of all living in Ontario the province gives you a rebate of 14,500 off the price of the car which is a very generous rebate although you pay the sales tax on the full price and then deduct the 14,500 which is a great deal at 26000 plus tax. On the new Tesla electric 18 wheeler trucks government is giving a whopping 70,000 rebate per truck.

    1. William says:

      Honda Clarity PHEV has a back seat that is nice and spacious. Comfort Galore!
      GM are you listening?

  29. FrankfurterBub says:

    So… I read the article but I still can’t figure out, why the hell I should avoid them. If it’s a compliance car, so what?
    A colleague of mine drives a A3 etron, he charges mostly at home, often at work, too. 80% of his commute is now emission free with a nice car.

    1. Russ says:

      Yeah, makes zero sense. I have an e-tron and have driven about 10,000 miles fully electric over the past year. Not sure how that’s a bad thing.

      Even if the battery only gives 10 miles of electric range, this cuts the fuel use of the average daily commute in the US by a third. Again, why is this bad?

  30. Nix says:

    I view the premise of this article, that if we don’t buy them that they will build better cars to be short sighted. Because the other option they have is to just not build any EV’s/PHEV’s at all, and use the lack of sales as an excuse to get rid of mandates. They are already trying to do that anyways.

    I find this argument the same as if everybody would have said don’t buy the original Leaf in 2011. That a lack of sales somehow would have forced Nissan to build a 200+ mile version back half a decade ago. It simply doesn’t work that way. In fact, what we saw was that when they didn’t hit their initial sales targets, they sold off their battery factory. So we already know what happens when plug-ins don’t sell. Companies don’t double down and build more expensive longer range EV’s. They pull back instead.

    1. Spider-Dan says:

      Good point. You don’t get more-and-better EVs by letting the existing ones sit on the lot.

    2. pjwood1 says:

      The premise of the article is more capable electric modes already exist. Better drivetrains are being built, today, for those wanting more KWh: power, miles and less chance an engine comes on. It is fair to compare:

  31. mustang_sallas says:

    Seriously, this article should be taken down. There are so many mainstream consumers who are so far from ready to commit to a pure electric car, or to spend thousands extra to get something like a Volt. If those people are ready to consider a modest PHEV, let’s welcome them on board, rather than have BEV purists scare them away. This article only throws doubt on a market that needs all the help it can get.

    1. pjwood1 says:

      Did you read the article? “pure electric car”?

      I thought I read a piece about expensive plug-ins, with really small batteries. There’s lots of goodness between something bigger and a battery electric vehicle (BEV).

  32. ericonline says:

    What does it say about this article that the majority of IEV readers think it’s ridiculous? I applaud BMW. They now have a PHEV of all their top selling gas cars – 3,5,7 series and X5. Imagine if every top selling gas car had a PHEV vetsion. So some of the customers who are interested in the gas version might consider the plugin. That’s great! And every sale of these low range plugins advances the technology in many ways, as other posts have indicated. The first versions of these PHEVs might only get 15 miles, but in a couple years the plugin 3 Series will prob get 20-25 miles. We should celebrate that instead of making “Very Good” the enemy of “Perfect”.

  33. Bolt driver says:

    I agree with the article. Small battery cars are not the answer.
    I find the volt battery is about half the size it needs to be and all these cars are even smaller batteries. In the cold and at highway speeds I could deplete most of these cars in around 5 miles. That doesn’t even get me to the grocery store. On my drive home in the winter I am routinely 50 miles/kwh or more in a vehicle rated around 25m/kwh. Unless you live in a warm urban environment these cars will just frustrate a user and enforce that ev’s have no range.
    Small batteries also encourages installing public L2 charging. You have to plug in all the time to even make short drives. As there are a lot more ev’s on the road I think these will be quickly obsolete. They simply take too long to charge which means you need a lot of them for even basic charging. As a big battery ev user I need big dcfc to do any meaningful charging.

  34. TheWay says:

    Why is 20 miles the cut off? The average commuter travels 15 miles one way for a total of 30 miles per day. That means the cut off point should be at least 30 miles! Ideally maybe even 40 to factor in conditions such as winter or etc.(To account for 90% of drivers you want 60-70 miles)

    The problem is this, when an PHEV is not getting the electric miles to do the full commute, people just use it as a non-plugin hybrid.

Leave a Reply to Spider-Dan Cancel reply