BMW i3 REx Does Not Currently Qualify For Clean Vehicle Rebate in California – UPDATE 2

5 months ago by George Betak 20

BMW i3 REx Does Not Qualify

March 26th, 2013 AM:  CCSE Says The BMW i3 REx is NOT eligible

MArch 26th, 2014 PM:

March 26th, 2014 PM: After A Little Chat With BMW, CCSE’s Wording Of The BMW i3 REx’s Certification Changes To Pending

Nathan Crawford, a prospective BMW i3 driver from Southern California reports to InsideEVs that the California Center for Sustainable Energy (CCSE) has recently updated its website. It presently indicates that the BMW i3 with range extender does not qualify for the clean vehicle rebate program (CVRP). The CCSE is a San Diego nonprofit, which administers one of the key programs the Air Resources Board established to further its mission, and reduce vehicular emissions levels in California.

Editor’s Update: After being alerted to the posted online status of the BMW i3 REx, the CCSE has clarified that while the extended range BMW does not currently qualify for participate in the CVRP program, the reason is not that it has failed the criteria – but that it “has not been certified the ARB yet” 

CCSE Haeder Image

CCSE Header Image

The rebate program is an important driver of adoption for plugin vehicles, and if the BMW i3 REx did not qualify, this will very likely impact the decision-making process for prospects. While some buyers might be able to switch to the pure electric trim, others could decide to go with a different vehicle altogether. Although the clean vehicle rebate is important, other programs, such as single-occupant access to HOV and HOT lanes, could be even more significant.

The qualification criteria for both HOV stickers and the rebate hinges on one common denominator: Advanced Technology-Partial Zero Emissions Vehicle (AT-PZEV) or Transitional Zero-Emission Vehicle (TZEV) certification. After all, these vehicles are supposed to help us make the air cleaner, and not the other way around. To that end, the Air Resources Board requires all auto manufacturers to submit a vehicle for certification and testing, which can take several weeks. It’s  important to note that if a new car model is purchased before it was added to the list of eligible vehicles, it will not qualify for any benefit under the CVRP program.

"Green" Sticker Explained

“Green” Sticker Explained (via CARB)

Based on what the Center for Sustainable Energy has published on its website, it’s difficult to say if the BMW i3 REx has been submitted for certification and failed, or if it’s still pending submission. The outcome would be the same in both cases: the CCSE won’t issue a rebate, and the DMV won’t consider an HOV sticker application, until a vehicle has been deemed eligible by the Air Resources Board, and has passed the certification process.

While it’s still unclear if the range-extended trim will qualify for the $1,500 or $2,500 rebate amount, and if it will get green or white stickers, it’s anticipated it will qualify for both programs, but at this late stage we can’t be sure.  The 2011 Chevy Volt did not meet the AT-PZEV emission criteria and thus did not qualify.  Let’s hope that the i3 REx will avoid a similar fate.

2011 Chevy Volt Did Not Qualify For Green Sticker, But Later Model Years Volts Did

2011 Chevy Volt Did Not Qualify For Green Sticker, But Later Model Years Volts Did

The CVRP implementation manual for fiscal year 2013-14 states the following on the topic:

BMW i3 With REx

BMW i3 With REx

The CVRP List of Eligible Vehicle Models will be periodically updated as manufacturers submit applications and vehicle models are approved. In order for a vehicle to be eligible for a rebate, the vehicle manufacturer must submit to ARB the Vehicle Eligibility Application in Attachment A and all supporting documentation. ARB will work with the vehicle manufacturer to ensure that all the required documentation is received and request any additional information needed to make an eligibility determination. If the vehicle meets the eligibility requirements set forth in Section B(2) of this Implementation Manual, then ARB will add the vehicle to the List of Eligible Vehicle Models, calculate the rebate amount, and provide the updated list to the Administrator. New model years of vehicles already approved for CVRP eligibility can be rebated prior to the new model year being added to the List of Eligible Vehicle Models. All other new vehicle models purchased before being on the List of Eligible Vehicle Models are not rebate eligible.

With the exception of ZEMs, the vehicle model must be certified by ARB as a new, zero-emission or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle as defined in the California ZEV Regulation, section 1962.1(d)(5)(A), Title 13, CCR for 2009 and subsequent model years. The manufacturer must also certify that the vehicle model complies with all applicable federal safety standards for new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle equipment issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). A table summarizing the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) for a number of vehicle categories is provided in Attachment B. FMVSS are found in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 571. If a written statement and documentation have been previously provided to ARB in the course of applying for the ARB certification of the vehicle model, no additional written statement is required.

And for the record, BMW previously issued this statement on the topic of its i3 REx and CVRP:

BMW i3 REx

BMW i3 REx

“The i3 with Range Extender qualifies for the green sticker, which is limited in numbers and will run out in the eventual future (possibly late in 2014). This is technically to be expected since the car is equipped with an internal combustion engine which potentially emits fuel fumes, and thus makes it harder to qualify for the white sticker which typically can be obtained by full battery-electric vehicles (BEV) and Hydrogen vehicles. The white sticker is not limited in terms of numbers. There is a continued, constructive relationship between BMW and CARB executives, and there has been no reversal of position. It also bears mention that the i3 with Range Extender qualifies for the full CA incentive amount of $2,500.”

The “possibly late in 2014″ statement is now no longer true.  Green stickers are expected to run out soon.  (as of last week  36,737 of 40,000 stickers have been claimed)

*We’ve reached out to BMW for response to this latest development in the i3 REx CVRP/green sticker saga.  We’ll update this post when we receive a response.

UPDATE: BMW has provided us this official response:

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has not yet completed the certification process for the i3 with Range Extender, as a result, the BMW i3 with Range Extender does not currently appear on CARB’s list of eligible vehicles. CARB will update its list as soon as the certification has been completed.

Eligible Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) from other manufacturers have qualified for the green HOV lane sticker. These have the same access and expiration date as the whiter sticker, however, the total number of eligible green stickers is limited.

The BMW i3 Battery Electric Vehicle has been certified for the white HOV lane sticker for use in California by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The white stickers are reserved for pure zero GHG emission vehicles. They are now valid until January 1, 2019. The i3 Battery Electric Vehicle does appear on the CARB website on the list of eligible vehicles.

Tags: , , , , , ,

20 responses to "BMW i3 REx Does Not Currently Qualify For Clean Vehicle Rebate in California – UPDATE 2"

  1. Bloggin says:

    The i3 REx won’t qualify and shouldn’t.

    If it has a gas tank and gasoline engine, it’s not zero emissions.

    The qualification is not to be a zero emissions vehicle ‘some’ of the time or ‘most’ of then time. But being zero emissions period.

    Since it is the first Extended Range EV, it will fall in a new category similar to the PHEVs on the CVRP list like the Volt, ELR, and the Ford Energi models.

    1. Dr. Kenneth Noisewater says:

      It’s BMW’s first extended range EV, the first one released in the US was the Volt.

      1. Bloggin says:

        The Volt is a PHEV. Even the CVRP has it defined as so.

        The Rex extended range EV’s gasoline engine does not turn the wheels and it cannot be driven by the gasoline engine alone like the Volt plug-in hybrid can.

        1. Nate says:

          Any vehicle with 2 distinct power sources is a hybrid. If it has a plug, it is also a plug in hybrid.

          The CVRP doesn’t define ANY vehicle using the EREV definition including the i3 with the range extender option.
          http://energycenter.org/clean-vehicle-rebate-project

        2. ModernMarvelFan says:

          @Bloggin,

          AGAIN, you lied:

          You said this: “it cannot be driven by the gasoline engine alone like the Volt plug-in hybrid can.”

          BS. Volt can NOT be powered by the engine alone. You are just a big fat lier who continue to talk like an idiot..

          I will continue to call you that until you have stop spreading the lie.

          Go and learn how Volt works before you make that silly statements again.

          Volt’s ICE can NOT power the wheel alone.

    2. Priusmaniac says:

      Perhaps but then again, will they condition your pure EV on whether you can prove you are driving on 100% renewable electricity, perhaps they will also add 100% renewable materials.

      That will not help EV adoption all together since the Rex presence is only there because, at present, the cost for extra batteries is too high and the supercharge infrastructure is not all over the place yet. So in a sense it punishes the EV itself for not being perfect already. That is long range, omnipresent superchargers everywhere and a price in the low 20000 $. That will come over time, but demanding that right now is simply unrealistic which then make the 100% requirement appear as an action against EV’s instead of pro EV’s.

    3. ModernMarvelFan says:

      Bloggin is generally clueless again.

      Volt is the ONLY one among the examples listed by Bloggin that can be powered in the EV mode alone.

      Unlike the Energi or Synergy powertrain, Volt’s EV mode is 100%. It is NOT subject to load or hills like Bloggin continue to lie about over and over again…

  2. scottf200 says:

    Did BMW neuter the REx performance/SOC/etc based on what CA told them would require for it to make it and then change their mind?

    1. JohnO says:

      Yes they did. According to this article, CARB had a clause that if a vehicle “has a range for the gasoline tank that is less than the all-electric range of the battery, it is essentially classified as an all-electric vehicle”

      The BMW i3 Rex was built with a gasoline range of less than the electric range.

      http://www.myelectriccarforums.com/bmw-i3-rex-will-be-only-gasoline-powered-with-hov-access-in-california/

  3. Kevin says:

    I think they kept the fuel tank at a very small 2.4 gal because of some of the rebate rules?

    1. Priusmaniac says:

      That mean we now have a super small 2.4 gal tank all over the world in all the i3 Rex and that it won’t deliver the california advantage it was decided upon.

      Next time, on the BMW i5 Rex, let’s have a proper 15 gal tank, in the first place and not condition it to whatever california may or may not decide.

      1. ModernMarvelFan says:

        In addition, the “hold mode” will have to be available as well. Maybe a slightly more powerful engine upgrade would be needed as well.

        The best thing about i3 beside the CFRP body is the fact that this is FIRST BEV with a REX as an option….

  4. GeorgeS says:

    What a confusing mess.

  5. Evil Attorney says:

    If CARB hasn’t completed its certification process yet, then i guess this technically isn’t BMW’s fault, unless they were late in getting a test model to CARB. That said, there is so much about the roll-out of the i3 that’s been a mess, considering that the i3 is intended to be more than just a compliance car. I feel like whomever is overseeing production of the i3 has been somewhat asleep at the wheel, so to speak.

  6. VoxP says:

    Meanwhile, (correct me if I’m wrong), Tesla is still skating by the battery swap rules and receiving ZEV credits for it.
    The purpose of the legislation should be to get the more environmentally sound vehicles on the road NOT to play favorites. My understanding is that the much lighter BMW is better for the environment overall when you take manufacturing and other attributes into consideration.
    Let’s hope this doesn’t lead to a lawsuit by BMW and other manufacturers which may uncover many things in CARB et al. that cripple it.

    1. qwerty says:

      You are kind of right. Tesla is getting the ZEV credits because the Model S DOES qualify.

      Why so many think it doesn’t qualify is beyond me. Have any of those who thinks they don’t qualify not read the Regulation set for this or do they just play…….well, I won’t say it.

  7. qwerty says:

    IMHO, the Green stickers are probably gone by now.
    BMW, late to the game there buddy…..

  8. ModernMarvelFan says:

    Well, Honda Civic GX (Natural gas) car get the White HOV sticker (ZEV)…

    How does CARB explain that one?

    1. qwerty says:

      The same reason why a FCEV get’s one. They are considered “Alternative Fuel” vehicles. Meaning, they don’t use Gasoline from the Sand Lands.

  9. MrEnergyCzar says:

    Does this mean the engine will come on earlier so there will rarely be any performance drop offs, on long inclines etc..??

    MrEnergyCzar

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>